mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Provably Valid and Diverse Mutations of Real-World Media Data for DNN Testing

arXiv 2112.01956 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2021cs.LG cs.CR cs.SEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks (DNNs) often accept high-dimensional media data (e.g., photos, text, and audio) and understand their perceptual content (e.g., a cat). To test DNNs, diverse inputs are needed to trigger mis-predictions. Some preliminary works use byte-level mutations or domain-specific filters (e.g., foggy), whose enabled mutations may be limited and likely error-prone. SOTA works employ deep generative models to generate (infinite) inputs. Also, to keep the mutated inputs perceptually valid (e.g., a cat remains a "cat" after mutation), existing efforts rely on imprecise and less generalizable heuristics. This study revisits two key objectives in media input mutation - perception diversity (DIV) and validity (VAL) - in a rigorous manner based on manifold, a well-developed theory capturing perceptions of high-dimensional media data in a low-dimensional space. We show important results that DIV and VAL inextricably bound each other, and prove that SOTA generative model-based methods fundamentally fail to mutate real-world media data (either sacrificing DIV or VAL). In contrast, we discuss the feasibility of mutating real-world media data with provably high DIV and VAL based on manifold. We concretize the technical solution of mutating media data of various formats (images, audios, text) via a unified manner based on manifold. Specifically, when media data are projected into a low-dimensional manifold, the data can be mutated by walking on the manifold with certain directions and step sizes. When contrasted with the input data, the mutated data exhibit encouraging DIV in the perceptual traits (e.g., lying vs. standing dog) while retaining reasonably high VAL (i.e., a dog remains a dog). We implement our techniques in DEEPWALK for testing DNNs. DEEPWALK outperforms prior methods in testing comprehensiveness and can find more error-triggering inputs with higher quality.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2021.

Builds on

46 of 99 references.

References · 46

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  4. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  6. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  7. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  8. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  9. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
  10. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
  11. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,970
  12. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
34 more
  1. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,626
  2. 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,054
  3. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,847
  4. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,636
  5. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
  6. 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,033
  7. 2018Self-Attention Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 809
  8. 2017Unsupervised Image-to-Image Translation Networkscited by 603
  9. 2018Assessing Generative Models via Precision and Recallcited by 406
  10. 2016Generative Visual Manipulation on the Natural Image Manifoldcited by 348
  11. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 311
  12. 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 251
  13. 2017Image reconstruction by domain transform manifold learningcited by 232
  14. 2018Adversarial Audio Synthesiscited by 225
  15. 2018Sensitivity and Generalization in Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 189
  16. 2017Modulating early visual processing by languagecited by 167
  17. 2017Fairness Testing: Testing Software for Discriminationcited by 126
  18. 2018Automated Directed Fairness Testingcited by 78
  19. 2018TensorFuzz: Debugging Neural Networks with Coverage-Guided Fuzzingcited by 68
  20. 2020Dirty Road Can Attack: Security of Deep Learning based Automated Lane Centering under Physical-World Attackcited by 64
  21. 2018DeepBillboard: Systematic Physical-World Testing of Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 50
  22. 2018Adversarial Sample Detection for Deep Neural Network through Model Mutation Testingcited by 48
  23. 2018Identifying Implementation Bugs in Machine Learning based Image Classifiers using Metamorphic Testingcited by 31
  24. 2019Structure-Invariant Testing for Machine Translationcited by 28
  25. 2018SphereReID: Deep Hypersphere Manifold Embedding for Person Re-Identificationcited by 27
  26. 2020Learning disconnected manifolds: a no GANs landcited by 25
  27. 2021Distribution-Aware Testing of Neural Networks Using Generative Modelscited by 22
  28. 2017Statistical Parametric Speech Synthesis Incorporating Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 16
  29. 2020SINVAD: Search-based Image Space Navigation for DNN Image Classifier Test Input Generationcited by 15
  30. 2019DeepSmartFuzzer: Reward Guided Test Generation For Deep Learningcited by 7
  31. 2020Manifold for Machine Learning Assurancecited by 5
  32. 2017Unsupervised Latent Behavior Manifold Learning from Acoustic Features: audio2behaviorcited by 3
  33. 2020Manifold-based Test Generation for Image Classifierscited by 3
  34. 2020MT-Teql: Evaluating and Augmenting Consistency of Text-to-SQL Models with Metamorphic Testingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.