mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exponential quantum advantage in processing massive classical data

arXiv 2604.07639 ↗First posted 8 Apr 2026quant-ph cs.AI cs.CCcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Broadly applicable quantum advantage, particularly in classical data processing and machine learning, has been a fundamental open problem. In this work, we prove that a small quantum computer of polylogarithmic size can perform large-scale classification and dimension reduction on massive classical data by processing samples on the fly, whereas any classical machine achieving the same prediction performance requires exponentially larger size. Furthermore, classical machines that are exponentially larger yet below the required size need superpolynomially more samples and time. We provide evidence for these quantum advantages in real-world applications, including single-cell RNA sequencing and movie review sentiment analysis, demonstrating four to six orders of magnitude reduction in size with fewer than 60 logical qubits. These quantum advantages are enabled by quantum oracle sketching, an algorithm for accessing the classical world in quantum superposition using only random classical data samples. Combined with classical shadows, our algorithm circumvents the data loading and readout bottleneck to construct succinct classical models from massive classical data, a task provably impossible for any classical machine that is not exponentially larger than the quantum machine. These quantum advantages persist even when classical machines are granted unlimited time or if BPP = BQP, and rely only on the correctness of quantum mechanics. Together, our results establish machine learning on classical data as a broad and natural domain of quantum advantage and a fundamental test of quantum mechanics at the complexity frontier.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 210 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2026.

Builds on

14 of 210 references.

References · 14

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  2. 2023Does provable absence of barren plateaus imply classical simulability?cited by 80
  3. 2023Exponential separations between classical and quantum learnerscited by 26
  4. 2024On the relation between trainability and dequantization of variational quantum learning modelscited by 25
  5. 2025Quantum Machine Learning: A Hands-on Tutorial for Machine Learning Practitioners and Researcherscited by 12
  6. 2025Generative quantum advantage for classical and quantum problemscited by 11
  7. 2021Memory-Sample Lower Bounds for Learning Parity with Noisecited by 10
  8. 2024Quantum Transformer: Accelerating model inference via quantum linear algebracited by 9
  9. 2021A quantum algorithm for training wide and deep classical neural networkscited by 7
  10. 2023A unifying framework for differentially private quantum algorithmscited by 7
  11. 2020Streaming Complexity of SVMscited by 3
  12. 2023Explainable quantum regression algorithm with encoded data structurecited by 3
2 more
  1. 2025Multi-Pass Streaming Lower Bounds for Approximating Max-Cutcited by 2
  2. 2023A Generalized Quantum Branching Programcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 11.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2021Revisiting dequantization and quantum advantage in learning tasks
  2. 2025Quantum Data Encoding and Variational Algorithms: A Framework for Hybrid Quantum Classical Machine Learning
  3. 2024A Quick Introduction to Quantum Machine Learning for Non-Practitioners
  4. 2023Classical Verification of Quantum Learning
  5. 2025Prospects for quantum advantage in machine learning from the representability of functions
  6. 2026Winning Lottery Tickets in Neural Networks via a Quantum-Inspired Classical Algorithm
  7. 2024Digital-Analog Quantum Machine Learning
  8. 2023A Framework for Demonstrating Practical Quantum Advantage: Racing Quantum against Classical Generative Models