Multicriteria interpretability driven Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep Learning methods are renowned for their performances, yet their lack of interpretability prevents them from high-stakes contexts. Recent model agnostic methods address this problem by providing post-hoc interpretability methods by reverse-engineering the model's inner workings. However, in many regulated fields, interpretability should be kept in mind from the start, which means that post-hoc methods are valid only as a sanity check after model training. Interpretability from the start, in an abstract setting, means posing a set of soft constraints on the model's behavior by injecting knowledge and annihilating possible biases. We propose a Multicriteria technique that allows to control the feature effects on the model's outcome by injecting knowledge in the objective function. We then extend the technique by including a non-linear knowledge function to account for more complex effects and local lack of knowledge. The result is a Deep Learning model that embodies interpretability from the start and aligns with the recent regulations. A practical empirical example based on credit risk, suggests that our approach creates performant yet robust models capable of overcoming biases derived from data scarcity.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2021.
Builds on
15 of 70 references.
References · 15
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 212
- 2019Informed Machine Learning -- A Taxonomy and Survey of Integrating Knowledge into Learning Systemscited by 203
- 2017Physics-guided Neural Networks (PGNN): An Application in Lake Temperature Modelingcited by 130
- 2020Interpretable Machine Learning -- A Brief History, State-of-the-Art and Challengescited by 120
- 2020Deep Learning for Financial Applications : A Surveycited by 90
- 2018Fashionable Modelling with Fluxcited by 53
- 2020Transparency, Auditability and eXplainability of Machine Learning Models in Credit Scoringcited by 26
- 2020Compensating data shortages in manufacturing with monotonicity knowledgecited by 4
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022Monotonic Neural Additive Models: Pursuing Regulated Machine Learning Models for Credit Scoringcited by 12
- 2022Generalized Groves of Neural Additive Models: Pursuing transparent and accurate machine learning models in financecited by 2
- 2022Interpretable Selective Learning in Credit Riskcited by 2
- 2023Can I Trust the Explanations? Investigating Explainable Machine Learning Methods for Monotonic Modelscited by 1
- 2025Explaining Risks: Axiomatic Risk Attributions for Financial Modelscited by 0
- 2025Explaining Risks: Axiomatic Risk Attributions for Financial Models7 Jun 2025
- 2023Can I Trust the Explanations? Investigating Explainable Machine Learning Methods for Monotonic Models23 Sep 2023
- 2022Interpretable Selective Learning in Credit Risk21 Sep 2022
- 2022Generalized Groves of Neural Additive Models: Pursuing transparent and accurate machine learning models in finance21 Sep 2022
- 2022Monotonic Neural Additive Models: Pursuing Regulated Machine Learning Models for Credit Scoring21 Sep 2022