Explaining Risks: Axiomatic Risk Attributions for Financial Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, machine learning models have achieved great success at the expense of highly complex black-box structures. By using axiomatic attribution methods, we can fairly allocate the contributions of each feature, thus allowing us to interpret the model predictions. In high-risk sectors such as finance, risk is just as important as mean predictions. Throughout this work, we address the following risk attribution problem: how to fairly allocate the risk given a model with data? We demonstrate with analysis and empirical examples that risk can be well allocated by extending the Shapley value framework.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2025.
Builds on
11 of 35 references.
References · 11
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
- 2022A Rigorous Study of Integrated Gradients Method and Extensions to Internal Neuron Attributionscited by 64
- 2022Monotonic Neural Additive Models: Pursuing Regulated Machine Learning Models for Credit Scoringcited by 12
- 2021Multicriteria interpretability driven Deep Learningcited by 5
- 2023Four Axiomatic Characterizations of the Integrated Gradients Attribution Methodcited by 5
- 2016Variance Allocation and Shapley Valuecited by 4
- 2023How to address monotonicity for model risk management?cited by 4
- 2021Portfolio risk allocation through Shapley valuecited by 1
- 2024Attribution Methods in Asset Pricing: Do They Account for Risk?cited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.