Impact of Benign Modifications on Discriminative Performance of Deepfake Detectors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deepfakes are becoming increasingly popular in both good faith applications such as in entertainment and maliciously intended manipulations such as in image and video forgery. Primarily motivated by the latter, a large number of deepfake detectors have been proposed recently in order to identify such content. While the performance of such detectors still need further improvements, they are often assessed in simple if not trivial scenarios. In particular, the impact of benign processing operations such as transcoding, denoising, resizing and enhancement are not sufficiently studied. This paper proposes a more rigorous and systematic framework to assess the performance of deepfake detectors in more realistic situations. It quantitatively measures how and to which extent each benign processing approach impacts a state-of-the-art deepfake detection method. By illustrating it in a popular deepfake detector, our benchmark proposes a framework to assess robustness of detectors and provides valuable insights to design more efficient deepfake detectors.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2021.
Builds on
22 of 25 references.
References · 22
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2018ESRGAN: Enhanced Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,250
- 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,095
- 2018Variational image compression with a scale hyperpriorcited by 910
- 2020First Order Motion Model for Image Animationcited by 698
- 2020A Lip Sync Expert Is All You Need for Speech to Lip Generation In The Wildcited by 669
- 2020Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videoscited by 631
- 2019Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensicscited by 573
- 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
- 2020High-Fidelity Generative Image Compressioncited by 331
10 more
- 2019Deferred Neural Rendering: Image Synthesis using Neural Texturescited by 253
- 2020DeeperForensics-1.0: A Large-Scale Dataset for Real-World Face Forgery Detectioncited by 251
- 2020DeepFakes and Beyond: A Survey of Face Manipulation and Fake Detectioncited by 231
- 2018DeepFakes: a New Threat to Face Recognition? Assessment and Detectioncited by 208
- 2019Multi-task Learning For Detecting and Segmenting Manipulated Facial Images and Videoscited by 130
- 2018Two-Stream Neural Networks for Tampered Face Detectioncited by 125
- 2016Fast Face-swap Using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 119
- 2018FaceForensics: A Large-scale Video Dataset for Forgery Detection in Human Facescited by 118
- 2020Towards Automatic Face-to-Face Translationcited by 95
- 2019Use of a Capsule Network to Detect Fake Images and Videoscited by 63
Built on by
Not cited yet.