An optimal tradeoff between entanglement and copy complexity for state tomography
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There has been significant interest in understanding how practical constraints on contemporary quantum devices impact the complexity of quantum learning. For the classic question of tomography, recent work tightly characterized the copy complexity for any protocol that can only measure one copy of the unknown state at a time, showing it is polynomially worse than if one can make fully-entangled measurements. While we now have a fairly complete picture of the rates for such tasks in the near-term and fault-tolerant regimes, it remains poorly understood what the landscape in between looks like. In this work, we study tomography in the natural setting where one can make measurements of t copies at a time. For sufficiently small ε, we show that for any t ≤ d2, widetildeTheta(fracd3√tε2) copies are necessary and sufficient to learn an unknown d-dimensional state ρ to trace distance ε. This gives a smooth and optimal interpolation between the known rates for single-copy and fully-entangled measurements. To our knowledge, this is the first smooth entanglement-copy tradeoff known for any quantum learning task, and for tomography, no intermediate point on this curve was known, even at t = 2. An important obstacle is that unlike the optimal single-copy protocol, the optimal fully-entangled protocol is inherently biased and thus precludes naive batching approaches. Instead, we devise a novel two-stage procedure that uses Keyl's algorithm to refine a crude estimate for ρ based on single-copy measurements. A key insight is to use Schur-Weyl sampling not to estimate the spectrum of ρ, but to estimate the deviation of ρ from the maximally mixed state. When ρ is far from the maximally mixed state, we devise a novel quantum splitting procedure that reduces to the case where ρ is close to maximally mixed.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2024.
Builds on
10 of 35 references.
References · 10
- 2021Quantum advantage in learning from experimentscited by 186
- 2016Efficient quantum tomography IIcited by 54
- 2021Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memorycited by 50
- 2020Entanglement is Necessary for Optimal Quantum Property Testingcited by 22
- 2022Learning Quantum Processes and Hamiltonians via the Pauli Transfer Matrixcited by 22
- 2021A Hierarchy for Replica Quantum Advantagecited by 16
- 2021Toward Instance-Optimal State Certification With Incoherent Measurementscited by 12
- 2022When Does Adaptivity Help for Quantum State Learning?cited by 12
- 2022Tight Bounds for Quantum State Certification with Incoherent Measurementscited by 11
- 2023Tight bounds on Pauli channel learning without entanglementcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2024Optimal high-precision shadow estimationcited by 1
- 2026Tight Lower Bounds for State Tomography with Limited Entanglementcited by 0
- 2026Tight Lower Bounds for State Tomography with Limited Entanglement4 Sep 2026
- 2024Optimal high-precision shadow estimation18 Jul 2024