Lower Bounds for Learning Quantum States with Single-Copy Measurements
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problems of quantum tomography and shadow tomography using measurements performed on individual, identical copies of an unknown d-dimensional state. We first revisit a known lower bound due to Haah et al. (2017) on quantum tomography with accuracy ε in trace distance, when the measurements choices are independent of previously observed outcomes (i.e., they are nonadaptive). We give a succinct proof of this result. This leads to stronger lower bounds when the learner uses measurements with a constant number of outcomes. In particular, this rigorously establishes the optimality of the folklore ``Pauli tomography" algorithm in terms of its sample complexity. We also derive novel bounds of Omega(r2 d/ε2) and Omega(r2 d2/ε2) for learning rank r states using arbitrary and constant-outcome measurements, respectively, in the nonadaptive case. In addition to the sample complexity, a resource of practical significance for learning quantum states is the number of different measurements used by an algorithm. We extend our lower bounds to the case where the learner performs possibly adaptive measurements from a fixed set of exp(O(d)) measurements. This implies in particular that adaptivity does not give us any advantage using single-copy measurements that are efficiently implementable. We also obtain a similar bound in the case where the goal is to predict the expectation values of a given sequence of observables, a task known as shadow tomography. Finally, in the case of adaptive, single-copy measurements implementable with polynomial-size circuits, we prove that a straightforward strategy based on computing sample means of the given observables is optimal.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2022.
Builds on
9 of 49 references.
References · 9
- 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 229
- 2021Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learningcited by 95
- 2016Efficient quantum tomography IIcited by 54
- 2021Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memorycited by 50
- 2018Online Learning of Quantum Statescited by 37
- 2020Entanglement is Necessary for Optimal Quantum Property Testingcited by 22
- 2021A Hierarchy for Replica Quantum Advantagecited by 16
- 2022When Does Adaptivity Help for Quantum State Learning?cited by 12
- 2022Tight Bounds for Quantum State Certification with Incoherent Measurementscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum statescited by 31
- 2023Lower Bounds on Learning Pauli Channels with Individual Measurementscited by 5
- 2023Transition Role of Entangled Data in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 5
- 2024Hamiltonian Property Testingcited by 4
- 2024Separable Power of Classical and Quantum Learning Protocols Through the Lens of No-Free-Lunch Theoremcited by 1
- 2026Tight Lower Bounds for State Tomography with Limited Entanglementcited by 0
- 2026Tight Lower Bounds for State Tomography with Limited Entanglement4 Sep 2026
- 2024Separable Power of Classical and Quantum Learning Protocols Through the Lens of No-Free-Lunch Theorem12 May 2024
- 2024Hamiltonian Property Testing5 Mar 2024
- 2023Transition Role of Entangled Data in Quantum Machine Learning6 Jun 2023
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum states31 May 2023
- 2023Lower Bounds on Learning Pauli Channels with Individual Measurements22 Jan 2023