mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Uncertainty Calibration for Ensemble-Based Debiasing Methods

arXiv 2111.04104 ↗First posted 7 Nov 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensemble-based debiasing methods have been shown effective in mitigating the reliance of classifiers on specific dataset bias, by exploiting the output of a bias-only model to adjust the learning target. In this paper, we focus on the bias-only model in these ensemble-based methods, which plays an important role but has not gained much attention in the existing literature. Theoretically, we prove that the debiasing performance can be damaged by inaccurate uncertainty estimations of the bias-only model. Empirically, we show that existing bias-only models fall short in producing accurate uncertainty estimations. Motivated by these findings, we propose to conduct calibration on the bias-only model, thus achieving a three-stage ensemble-based debiasing framework, including bias modeling, model calibrating, and debiasing. Experimental results on NLI and fact verification tasks show that our proposed three-stage debiasing framework consistently outperforms the traditional two-stage one in out-of-distribution accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2021.

Builds on

40 of 48 references.

References · 40

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  5. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  6. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  7. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  8. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  9. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  10. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  11. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
  12. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
28 more
  1. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
  2. 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 655
  3. 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 395
  4. 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 359
  5. 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 304
  6. 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 291
  7. 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 279
  8. 2019Approximating CNNs with Bag-of-local-Features models works surprisingly well on ImageNetcited by 260
  9. 2016Enhanced LSTM for Natural Language Inferencecited by 199
  10. 2019Learning De-biased Representations with Biased Representationscited by 199
  11. 2019RUBi: Reducing Unimodal Biases in Visual Question Answeringcited by 183
  12. 2019Evaluating model calibration in classificationcited by 165
  13. 2020What Can We Learn from Collective Human Opinions on Natural Language Inference Data?cited by 148
  14. 2019Towards Debiasing Fact Verification Modelscited by 143
  15. 2019End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in Corporacited by 127
  16. 2016Analyzing the Behavior of Visual Question Answering Modelscited by 119
  17. 2019Unlearn Dataset Bias in Natural Language Inference by Fitting the Residualcited by 119
  18. 2020Towards Debiasing NLU Models from Unknown Biasescited by 116
  19. 2019Compositional Questions Do Not Necessitate Multi-hop Reasoningcited by 87
  20. 2018How Much Reading Does Reading Comprehension Require? A Critical Investigation of Popular Benchmarkscited by 86
  21. 2020Mind the Trade-off: Debiasing NLU Models without Degrading the In-distribution Performancecited by 85
  22. 2020Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling themcited by 83
  23. 2019Understanding Dataset Design Choices for Multi-hop Reasoningcited by 50
  24. 2020Learning to Model and Ignore Dataset Bias with Mixed Capacity Ensemblescited by 43
  25. 2019On Adversarial Removal of Hypothesis-only Bias in Natural Language Inferencecited by 29
  26. 2020HypoNLI: Exploring the Artificial Patterns of Hypothesis-only Bias in Natural Language Inferencecited by 17
  27. 2020AdamP: Slowing Down the Slowdown for Momentum Optimizers on Scale-invariant Weightscited by 9
  28. 2019Selection Bias Explorations and Debias Methods for Natural Language Sentence Matching Datasetscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 6; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: