mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CausalAPM: Generalizable Literal Disentanglement for NLU Debiasing

arXiv 2305.02865 ↗First posted 4 May 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Dataset bias, i.e., the over-reliance on dataset-specific literal heuristics, is getting increasing attention for its detrimental effect on the generalization ability of NLU models. Existing works focus on eliminating dataset bias by down-weighting problematic data in the training process, which induce the omission of valid feature information while mitigating bias. In this work, We analyze the causes of dataset bias from the perspective of causal inference and propose CausalAPM, a generalizable literal disentangling framework to ameliorate the bias problem from feature granularity. The proposed approach projects literal and semantic information into independent feature subspaces, and constrains the involvement of literal information in subsequent predictions. Extensive experiments on three NLP benchmarks (MNLI, FEVER, and QQP) demonstrate that our proposed framework significantly improves the OOD generalization performance while maintaining ID performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2023.

Builds on

28 of 35 references.

References · 28

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  3. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  4. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  5. 2017Generative Adversarial Networks: An Overviewcited by 588
  6. 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 395
  7. 2018Towards a Definition of Disentangled Representationscited by 294
  8. 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 291
  9. 2018Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inferencecited by 211
  10. 2020Representation Learning via Invariant Causal Mechanismscited by 197
  11. 2017CausalGAN: Learning Causal Implicit Generative Models with Adversarial Trainingcited by 152
  12. 2019Towards Debiasing Fact Verification Modelscited by 143
16 more
  1. 2020An Empirical Study on Robustness to Spurious Correlations using Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 133
  2. 2019End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in Corporacited by 127
  3. 2020Towards Debiasing NLU Models from Unknown Biasescited by 116
  4. 2018Robustly Disentangled Causal Mechanisms: Validating Deep Representations for Interventional Robustnesscited by 108
  5. 2018The Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER) Shared Taskcited by 108
  6. 2020Mind the Trade-off: Debiasing NLU Models without Degrading the In-distribution Performancecited by 85
  7. 2018Bias and Generalization in Deep Generative Models: An Empirical Studycited by 83
  8. 2020Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling themcited by 83
  9. 2020Out of Order: How Important Is The Sequential Order of Words in a Sentence in Natural Language Understanding Tasks?cited by 72
  10. 2020UnNatural Language Inferencecited by 68
  11. 2020Improving Disentangled Text Representation Learning with Information-Theoretic Guidancecited by 52
  12. 2018Counterfactuals uncover the modular structure of deep generative modelscited by 51
  13. 2020Learning to Model and Ignore Dataset Bias with Mixed Capacity Ensemblescited by 43
  14. 2019Generative Adversarial Networks are Special Cases of Artificial Curiosity (1990) and also Closely Related to Predictability Minimization (1991)cited by 17
  15. 2021Uncertainty Calibration for Ensemble-Based Debiasing Methodscited by 16
  16. 2022Learning Disentangled Representations of Negation and Uncertaintycited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.