mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

General Greedy De-bias Learning

arXiv 2112.10572 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2021cs.LG cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks often make predictions relying on the spurious correlations from the datasets rather than the intrinsic properties of the task of interest, facing sharp degradation on out-of-distribution (OOD) test data. Existing de-bias learning frameworks try to capture specific dataset bias by annotations but they fail to handle complicated OOD scenarios. Others implicitly identify the dataset bias by special design low capability biased models or losses, but they degrade when the training and testing data are from the same distribution. In this paper, we propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model. The base model is encouraged to focus on examples that are hard to solve with biased models, thus remaining robust against spurious correlations in the test stage. GGD largely improves models' OOD generalization ability on various tasks, but sometimes over-estimates the bias level and degrades on the in-distribution test. We further re-analyze the ensemble process of GGD and introduce the Curriculum Regularization inspired by curriculum learning, which achieves a good trade-off between in-distribution and out-of-distribution performance. Extensive experiments on image classification, adversarial question answering, and visual question answering demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 78 of its 103 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2021.

Builds on

78 of 103 references.

References · 78

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  4. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  6. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  7. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  8. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  9. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
  10. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
  11. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  12. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
38 more
  1. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  2. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,312
  3. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
  4. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,245
  5. 2017Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomycited by 1,013
  6. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  7. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 989
  8. 2019Decoupling Representation and Classifier for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 809
  9. 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 683
  10. 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 571
  11. 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 436
  12. 2020Self-Challenging Improves Cross-Domain Generalizationcited by 426
  13. 2018QuAC : Question Answering in Contextcited by 381
  14. 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
  15. 2019The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes, Words, and Sentences From Natural Supervisioncited by 372
  16. 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 339
  17. 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
  18. 2021Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Modelscited by 296
  19. 2018Bilinear Attention Networkscited by 280
  20. 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 280
  21. 2016Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehensioncited by 278
  22. 2020Gradient Starvation: A Learning Proclivity in Neural Networkscited by 267
  23. 2020Counterfactual VQA: A Cause-Effect Look at Language Biascited by 266
  24. 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
  25. 2019Learning De-biased Representations with Biased Representationscited by 199
  26. 2021Distribution Alignment: A Unified Framework for Long-tail Visual Recognitioncited by 198
  27. 2019RUBi: Reducing Unimodal Biases in Visual Question Answeringcited by 185
  28. 2018Compositional Attention Networks for Machine Reasoningcited by 183
  29. 2017Domain Generalization by Marginal Transfer Learningcited by 180
  30. 2020Counterfactual Samples Synthesizing for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 153
  31. 2021Deep Stable Learning for Out-Of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 153
  32. 2021On Calibration and Out-of-domain Generalizationcited by 134
  33. 2019Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More Groundedcited by 128
  34. 2019End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in Corporacited by 128
  35. 2017Learning to Reason: End-to-End Module Networks for Visual Question Answeringcited by 125
  36. 2019Learning Robust Representations by Projecting Superficial Statistics Outcited by 123
  37. 2020Towards Debiasing NLU Models from Unknown Biasescited by 116
  38. 2015Yin and Yang: Balancing and Answering Binary Visual Questionscited by 109

50 most cited of 78 All 78 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 4.

7 papers.