mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Online Learning in Contextual Second-Price Pay-Per-Click Auctions

arXiv 2310.05047 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2023cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study online learning in contextual pay-per-click auctions where at each of the T rounds, the learner receives some context along with a set of ads and needs to make an estimate on their click-through rate (CTR) in order to run a second-price pay-per-click auction. The learner's goal is to minimize her regret, defined as the gap between her total revenue and that of an oracle strategy that always makes perfect CTR predictions. We first show that √T-regret is obtainable via a computationally inefficient algorithm and that it is unavoidable since our algorithm is no easier than the classical multi-armed bandit problem. A by-product of our results is a √T-regret bound for the simpler non-contextual setting, improving upon a recent work of [Feng et al., 2023] by removing the inverse CTR dependency that could be arbitrarily large. Then, borrowing ideas from recent advances on efficient contextual bandit algorithms, we develop two practically efficient contextual auction algorithms: the first one uses the exponential weight scheme with optimistic square errors and maintains the same √T-regret bound, while the second one reduces the problem to online regression via a simple epsilon-greedy strategy, albeit with a worse regret bound. Finally, we conduct experiments on a synthetic dataset to showcase the effectiveness and superior performance of our algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2023.

Builds on

18 of 50 references.

References · 18

  1. 2021The Statistical Complexity of Interactive Decision Makingcited by 208
  2. 2014Taming the Monster: A Fast and Simple Algorithm for Contextual Banditscited by 200
  3. 2020Beyond UCB: Optimal and Efficient Contextual Bandits with Regression Oraclescited by 195
  4. 2020Bypassing the Monster: A Faster and Simpler Optimal Algorithm for Contextual Bandits under Realizabilitycited by 114
  5. 2018Practical Contextual Bandits with Regression Oraclescited by 92
  6. 2021Feel-Good Thompson Sampling for Contextual Bandits and Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
  7. 2020The Best of Many Worlds: Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation Problemscited by 58
  8. 2021Efficient First-Order Contextual Bandits: Prediction, Allocation, and Triangular Discriminationcited by 53
  9. 2020Upper Counterfactual Confidence Bounds: a New Optimism Principle for Contextual Banditscited by 35
  10. 2020Learning to Bid Optimally and Efficiently in Adversarial First-price Auctionscited by 33
  11. 2021Robust Auction Design in the Auto-bidding Worldcited by 21
  12. 2020Taking a hint: How to leverage loss predictors in contextual bandits?cited by 20
6 more
  1. 2023Autobidders with Budget and ROI Constraints: Efficiency, Regret, and Pacing Dynamicscited by 20
  2. 2022Budget Pacing in Repeated Auctions: Regret and Efficiency without Convergencecited by 18
  3. 2022Contextual Bandits with Smooth Regret: Efficient Learning in Continuous Action Spacescited by 17
  4. 2023Learning to Bid in Repeated First-Price Auctions with Budgetscited by 14
  5. 2020VCG Mechanism Design with Unknown Agent Values under Stochastic Bandit Feedbackcited by 5
  6. 2023On the Robustness of Epoch-Greedy in Multi-Agent Contextual Bandit Mechanismscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.