mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Meta-Learning the Search Distribution of Black-Box Random Search Based Adversarial Attacks

arXiv 2111.01714 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial attacks based on randomized search schemes have obtained state-of-the-art results in black-box robustness evaluation recently. However, as we demonstrate in this work, their efficiency in different query budget regimes depends on manual design and heuristic tuning of the underlying proposal distributions. We study how this issue can be addressed by adapting the proposal distribution online based on the information obtained during the attack. We consider Square Attack, which is a state-of-the-art score-based black-box attack, and demonstrate how its performance can be improved by a learned controller that adjusts the parameters of the proposal distribution online during the attack. We train the controller using gradient-based end-to-end training on a CIFAR10 model with white box access. We demonstrate that plugging the learned controller into the attack consistently improves its black-box robustness estimate in different query regimes by up to 20% for a wide range of different models with black-box access. We further show that the learned adaptation principle transfers well to the other data distributions such as CIFAR100 or ImageNet and to the targeted attack setting.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 64 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2021.

Builds on

64 of 78 references.

References · 64

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  6. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  7. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  8. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  9. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
  10. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  11. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  12. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
38 more
  1. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
  2. 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,148
  3. 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,018
  4. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  5. 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 950
  6. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
  7. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
  8. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 685
  9. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
  10. 2016Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descentcited by 620
  11. 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 555
  12. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
  13. 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 501
  14. 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 462
  15. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 416
  16. 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
  17. 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 333
  18. 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 316
  19. 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
  20. 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 278
  21. 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences: A Surveycited by 259
  22. 2019Simple Black-box Adversarial Attackscited by 251
  23. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 243
  24. 2018Adversarial Risk and the Dangers of Evaluating Against Weak Attackscited by 221
  25. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 214
  26. 2021Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmarkcited by 208
  27. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
  28. 2019You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principlecited by 183
  29. 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 172
  30. 2020Self-Adaptive Training: beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 126
  31. 2019Improving Black-box Adversarial Attacks with a Transfer-based Priorcited by 121
  32. 2018Decoupling Direction and Norm for Efficient Gradient-Based L2 Adversarial Attacks and Defensescited by 109
  33. 2020QEBA: Query-Efficient Boundary-Based Blackbox Attackcited by 104
  34. 2020Learnable Boundary Guided Adversarial Trainingcited by 93
  35. 2018GenAttack: Practical Black-box Attacks with Gradient-Free Optimizationcited by 82
  36. 2020Adversarial Robustness on In- and Out-Distribution Improves Explainabilitycited by 73
  37. 2019advertorch v0.1: An Adversarial Robustness Toolbox based on PyTorchcited by 69
  38. 2020Sparse-RS: a versatile framework for query-efficient sparse black-box adversarial attackscited by 65

50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

7 papers.