Gradient Frequency Modulation for Visually Explaining Video Understanding Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In many applications, it is essential to understand why a machine learning model makes the decisions it does, but this is inhibited by the black-box nature of state-of-the-art neural networks. Because of this, increasing attention has been paid to explainability in deep learning, including in the area of video understanding. Due to the temporal dimension of video data, the main challenge of explaining a video action recognition model is to produce spatiotemporally consistent visual explanations, which has been ignored in the existing literature. In this paper, we propose Frequency-based Extremal Perturbation (F-EP) to explain a video understanding model's decisions. Because the explanations given by perturbation methods are noisy and non-smooth both spatially and temporally, we propose to modulate the frequencies of gradient maps from the neural network model with a Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT). We show in a range of experiments that F-EP provides more spatiotemporally consistent explanations that more faithfully represent the model's decisions compared to the existing state-of-the-art methods.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2021.
Builds on
30 of 49 references.
References · 30
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,303
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
- 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,139
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
18 more
- 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
- 2018TSM: Temporal Shift Module for Efficient Video Understandingcited by 852
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
- 2018Scaling Egocentric Vision: The EPIC-KITCHENS Datasetcited by 789
- 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
- 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
- 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
- 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 257
- 2015Explaining NonLinear Classification Decisions with Deep Taylor Decompositioncited by 248
- 2020Axiom-based Grad-CAM: Towards Accurate Visualization and Explanation of CNNscited by 151
- 2019Why Can't I Dance in the Mall? Learning to Mitigate Scene Bias in Action Recognitioncited by 117
- 2017End-to-end Training for Whole Image Breast Cancer Diagnosis using An All Convolutional Designcited by 87
- 2018Low Frequency Adversarial Perturbationcited by 80
- 2019On the Effectiveness of Low Frequency Perturbationscited by 56
- 2019Interpretable and Fine-Grained Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 49
- 2018Understanding Individual Decisions of CNNs via Contrastive Backpropagationcited by 40
- 2019Saliency Tubes: Visual Explanations for Spatio-Temporal Convolutionscited by 20
- 2017Excitation Backprop for RNNscited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.