mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Federated Semi-Supervised Learning with Class Distribution Mismatch

arXiv 2111.00010 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2021cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many existing federated learning (FL) algorithms are designed for supervised learning tasks, assuming that the local data owned by the clients are well labeled. However, in many practical situations, it could be difficult and expensive to acquire complete data labels. Federated semi-supervised learning (Fed-SSL) is an attractive solution for fully utilizing both labeled and unlabeled data. Similar to that encountered in federated supervised learning, class distribution of labeled/unlabeled data could be non-i.i.d. among clients. Besides, in each client, the class distribution of labeled data may be distinct from that of unlabeled data. Unfortunately, both can severely jeopardize the FL performance. To address such challenging issues, we introduce two proper regularization terms that can effectively alleviate the class distribution mismatch problem in Fed-SSL. In addition, to overcome the non-i.i.d. data, we leverage the variance reduction and normalized averaging techniques to develop a novel Fed-SSL algorithm. Theoretically, we prove that the proposed method has a convergence rate of O(1/√T), where T is the number of communication rounds, even when the data distribution are non-i.i.d. among clients. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first formal convergence result for Fed-SSL problems. Numerical experiments based on MNIST data and CIFAR-10 data show that the proposed method can greatly improve the classification accuracy compared to baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2021.

Builds on

24 of 48 references.

References · 24

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  3. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  4. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
  5. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
  6. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,130
  7. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  8. 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 920
  9. 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 906
  10. 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 605
  11. 2016Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligencecited by 564
  12. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 464
12 more
  1. 2014SAGA: A Fast Incremental Gradient Method With Support for Non-Strongly Convex Composite Objectivescited by 402
  2. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  3. 2015Semi-Supervised Learning with Ladder Networkscited by 247
  4. 2020Federated Semi-Supervised Learning with Inter-Client Consistency & Disjoint Learningcited by 112
  5. 2019First Analysis of Local GD on Heterogeneous Datacited by 81
  6. 2019Variance Reduced Local SGD with Lower Communication Complexitycited by 80
  7. 2016On Nonconvex Decentralized Gradient Descentcited by 42
  8. 2014Block stochastic gradient iteration for convex and nonconvex optimizationcited by 22
  9. 2014Multi-Agent Distributed Optimization via Inexact Consensus ADMMcited by 21
  10. 2020Improving Semi-supervised Federated Learning by Reducing the Gradient Diversity of Modelscited by 10
  11. 2019Clustering by Orthogonal NMF Model and Non-Convex Penalty Optimizationcited by 9
  12. 2020Exploiting Unlabeled Data in Smart Cities using Federated Learningcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

6 papers.