mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Algorithmic encoding of protected characteristics in image-based models for disease detection

arXiv 2110.14755 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It has been rightfully emphasized that the use of AI for clinical decision making could amplify health disparities. An algorithm may encode protected characteristics, and then use this information for making predictions due to undesirable correlations in the (historical) training data. It remains unclear how we can establish whether such information is actually used. Besides the scarcity of data from underserved populations, very little is known about how dataset biases manifest in predictive models and how this may result in disparate performance. This article aims to shed some light on these issues by exploring new methodology for subgroup analysis in image-based disease detection models. We utilize two publicly available chest X-ray datasets, CheXpert and MIMIC-CXR, to study performance disparities across race and biological sex in deep learning models. We explore test set resampling, transfer learning, multitask learning, and model inspection to assess the relationship between the encoding of protected characteristics and disease detection performance across subgroups. We confirm subgroup disparities in terms of shifted true and false positive rates which are partially removed after correcting for population and prevalence shifts in the test sets. We further find a previously used transfer learning method to be insufficient for establishing whether specific patient information is used for making predictions. The proposed combination of test-set resampling, multitask learning, and model inspection reveals valuable new insights about the way protected characteristics are encoded in the feature representations of deep neural networks.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2021.

Builds on

22 of 59 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  4. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  5. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
  6. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
  7. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
  8. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 384
  9. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  10. 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
  11. 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
  12. 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 222
10 more
  1. 2019Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 216
  2. 2019Causality matters in medical imagingcited by 193
  3. 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 192
  4. 2018Path-Specific Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 181
  5. 2021Reading Race: AI Recognises Patient's Racial Identity In Medical Imagescited by 156
  6. 2020CheXclusion: Fairness gaps in deep chest X-ray classifierscited by 153
  7. 2018Turning a Blind Eye: Explicit Removal of Biases and Variation from Deep Neural Network Embeddingscited by 114
  8. 2017Predicting Cardiovascular Risk Factors from Retinal Fundus Photographs using Deep Learningcited by 63
  9. 2019Can You Trust This Prediction? Auditing Pointwise Reliability After Learningcited by 28
  10. 2020To Split or Not to Split: The Impact of Disparate Treatment in Classificationcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

7 papers.