mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DeepRepViz: Identifying Confounders in Deep Learning Model Predictions

arXiv 2309.15551 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Learning (DL) models have gained popularity in neuroimaging studies for predicting psychological behaviors, cognitive traits, and brain pathologies. However, these models can be biased by confounders such as age, sex, or imaging artifacts from the acquisition process. To address this, we introduce 'DeepRepViz', a two-part framework designed to identify confounders in DL model predictions. The first component is a visualization tool that can be used to qualitatively examine the final latent representation of the DL model. The second component is a metric called 'Con-score' that quantifies the confounder risk associated with a variable, using the final latent representation of the DL model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the Con-score using a simple simulated setup by iteratively altering the strength of a simulated confounder and observing the corresponding change in the Con-score. Next, we validate the DeepRepViz framework on a large-scale neuroimaging dataset (n=12000) by performing three MRI-phenotype prediction tasks that include (a) predicting chronic alcohol users, (b) classifying participant sex, and (c) predicting performance speed on a cognitive task called 'trail making'. DeepRepViz identifies sex as a significant confounder in the DL model predicting chronic alcohol users (Con-score=0.35) and age as a confounder in the model predicting cognitive task performance (Con-score=0.3). In conclusion, the DeepRepViz framework provides a systematic approach to test for potential confounders such as age, sex, and imaging artifacts and improves the transparency of DL models for neuroimaging studies.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2023.

Builds on

6 of 28 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  2. 2020Risk of Training Diagnostic Algorithms on Data with Demographic Biascited by 23
  3. 2021Algorithmic encoding of protected characteristics in image-based models for disease detectioncited by 7
  4. 2021Statistical quantification of confounding bias in predictive modellingcited by 7
  5. 2017The Same Analysis Approach: Practical protection against the pitfalls of novel neuroimaging analysis methodscited by 4
  6. 2023Promises and pitfalls of deep neural networks in neuroimaging-based psychiatric researchcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.