mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Feature and Label Embedding Spaces Matter in Addressing Image Classifier Bias

arXiv 2110.14336 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2021cs.CVcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper strives to address image classifier bias, with a focus on both feature and label embedding spaces. Previous works have shown that spurious correlations from protected attributes, such as age, gender, or skin tone, can cause adverse decisions. To balance potential harms, there is a growing need to identify and mitigate image classifier bias. First, we identify in the feature space a bias direction. We compute class prototypes of each protected attribute value for every class, and reveal an existing subspace that captures the maximum variance of the bias. Second, we mitigate biases by mapping image inputs to label embedding spaces. Each value of the protected attribute has its projection head where classes are embedded through a latent vector representation rather than a common one-hot encoding. Once trained, we further reduce in the feature space the bias effect by removing its direction. Evaluation on biased image datasets, for multi-class, multi-label and binary classifications, shows the effectiveness of tackling both feature and label embedding spaces in improving the fairness of the classifier predictions, while preserving classification performance.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2021.

Builds on

38 of 56 references.

References · 38

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  4. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  5. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  6. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
  7. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,290
  8. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  9. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  10. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  11. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  12. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
26 more
  1. 2016InfoGAN: Interpretable Representation Learning by Information Maximizing Generative Adversarial Netscited by 860
  2. 2017Maximum Classifier Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 683
  3. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  4. 2016MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognitioncited by 624
  5. 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
  6. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  7. 2018Taking A Closer Look at Domain Shift: Category-level Adversaries for Semantics Consistent Domain Adaptationcited by 295
  8. 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
  9. 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
  10. 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 253
  11. 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
  12. 2020Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?cited by 237
  13. 2018Women also Snowboard: Overcoming Bias in Captioning Modelscited by 236
  14. 2015Simultaneous Deep Transfer Across Domains and Taskscited by 206
  15. 2019Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddingscited by 203
  16. 2018Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddingscited by 169
  17. 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
  18. 2019Towards Fairer Datasets: Filtering and Balancing the Distribution of the People Subtree in the ImageNet Hierarchycited by 156
  19. 2017No Classification without Representation: Assessing Geodiversity Issues in Open Data Sets for the Developing Worldcited by 153
  20. 2019Does Object Recognition Work for Everyone?cited by 151
  21. 2020Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructurecited by 138
  22. 2020REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 136
  23. 2018Turning a Blind Eye: Explicit Removal of Biases and Variation from Deep Neural Network Embeddingscited by 114
  24. 2019Diversity in Facescited by 77
  25. 2021Mitigating Dataset Harms Requires Stewardship: Lessons from 1000 Paperscited by 49
  26. 2020On the Robustness of Face Recognition Algorithms Against Attacks and Biascited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 6; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

11 papers.