Assessing Evaluation Metrics for Speech-to-Speech Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Speech-to-speech translation combines machine translation with speech synthesis, introducing evaluation challenges not present in either task alone. How to automatically evaluate speech-to-speech translation is an open question which has not previously been explored. Translating to speech rather than to text is often motivated by unwritten languages or languages without standardized orthographies. However, we show that the previously used automatic metric for this task is best equipped for standardized high-resource languages only. In this work, we first evaluate current metrics for speech-to-speech translation, and second assess how translation to dialectal variants rather than to standardized languages impacts various evaluation methods.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2021.
Builds on
15 of 37 references.
References · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
- 2016WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audiocited by 1,710
- 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
- 2017Natural TTS Synthesis by Conditioning WaveNet on Mel Spectrogram Predictionscited by 800
- 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 334
- 2019Direct speech-to-speech translation with a sequence-to-sequence modelcited by 118
- 2016Toward Multilingual Neural Machine Translation with Universal Encoder and Decodercited by 76
- 2019Speech Recognition with Augmented Synthesized Speechcited by 60
- 2019CSS10: A Collection of Single Speaker Speech Datasets for 10 Languagescited by 54
- 2020UWSpeech: Speech to Speech Translation for Unwritten Languagescited by 43
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2022UnitY: Two-pass Direct Speech-to-speech Translation with Discrete Unitscited by 60
- 2022Towards Building Text-To-Speech Systems for the Next Billion Userscited by 27
- 2022BLASER: A Text-Free Speech-to-Speech Translation Evaluation Metriccited by 16
- 2022A Textless Metric for Speech-to-Speech Comparisoncited by 4
- 2024A Collection of Pragmatic-Similarity Judgments over Spoken Dialog Utterancescited by 2
- 2024Kahaani: A Multimodal Co-Creative Storytelling Systemcited by 1
- 2026OpenSTBench: Beyond Semantic Evaluation for Speech Translationcited by 1
- 2023Applying Automated Machine Translation to Educational Video Coursescited by 0
- 2025Audio-Based Crowd-Sourced Evaluation of Machine Translation Qualitycited by 0
- 2026ASTRA: A Scalable Next-Generation ATCO Training Simulator with Autonomous Simpilotscited by 0
- 2026ASTRA: A Scalable Next-Generation ATCO Training Simulator with Autonomous Simpilots16 Jun 2026
- 2026OpenSTBench: Beyond Semantic Evaluation for Speech Translation29 May 2026
- 2025Audio-Based Crowd-Sourced Evaluation of Machine Translation Quality17 Sep 2025
- 2024Kahaani: A Multimodal Co-Creative Storytelling System17 Sep 2024
- 2024A Collection of Pragmatic-Similarity Judgments over Spoken Dialog Utterances21 Mar 2024
- 2023Applying Automated Machine Translation to Educational Video Courses9 Jan 2023
- 2022BLASER: A Text-Free Speech-to-Speech Translation Evaluation Metric16 Dec 2022
- 2022UnitY: Two-pass Direct Speech-to-speech Translation with Discrete Units15 Dec 2022
- 2022Towards Building Text-To-Speech Systems for the Next Billion Users17 Nov 2022
- 2022A Textless Metric for Speech-to-Speech Comparison21 Oct 2022