ℓ∞-Bounds of the MLE in the BTL Model under General Comparison Graphs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) model is a popular statistical approach for estimating the global ranking of a collection of items using pairwise comparisons. To ensure accurate ranking, it is essential to obtain precise estimates of the model parameters in the ℓ∞-loss. The difficulty of this task depends crucially on the topology of the pairwise comparison graph over the given items. However, beyond very few well-studied cases, such as the complete and Erd"os-R'enyi comparison graphs, little is known about the performance of the maximum likelihood estimator MLE) of the BTL model parameters in the ℓ∞-loss under more general graph topologies. In this paper, we derive novel, general upper bounds on the ℓ∞ estimation error of the BTL MLE that depend explicitly on the algebraic connectivity of the comparison graph, the maximal performance gap across items and the sample complexity. We demonstrate that the derived bounds perform well and in some cases are sharper compared to known results obtained using different loss functions and more restricted assumptions and graph topologies. We carefully compare our results to Yan et al. (2012), which is closest in spirit to our work. We further provide minimax lower bounds under ℓ∞-error that nearly match the upper bounds over a class of sufficiently regular graph topologies. Finally, we study the implications of our ℓ∞-bounds for efficient (offline) tournament design. We illustrate and discuss our findings through various examples and simulations.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2021.
Builds on
10 of 48 references.
References · 10
- 2014Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexitycited by 569
- 2015Estimation from Pairwise Comparisons: Sharp Minimax Bounds with Topology Dependencecited by 59
- 2017Spectral Method and Regularized MLE Are Both Optimal for Top-K Rankingcited by 46
- 2015Spectral MLE: Top-K Rank Aggregation from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 34
- 2014Minimax-optimal Inference from Partial Rankingscited by 22
- 2019Rank Aggregation via Heterogeneous Thurstone Preference Modelscited by 12
- 2019On Sample Complexity Upper and Lower Bounds for Exact Ranking from Noisy Comparisonscited by 10
- 2013Statistical Modelling of Citation Exchange Between Statistics Journalscited by 4
- 2019Graph Resistance and Learning from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 4
- 2020Spectral Methods for Ranking with Scarce Datacited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2023Spectral Ranking Inferences based on General Multiway Comparisonscited by 10
- 2024Sequential Manipulation Against Rank Aggregation: Theory and Algorithmcited by 7
- 2023Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons in General Graphs and Graphs with Localitycited by 3
- 2024Top-K ranking with a monotone adversarycited by 2
- 2026What Does Preference Learning Recover from Pairwise Comparison Data?cited by 2
- 2024An Analysis of Elo Rating Systems via Markov Chainscited by 1
- 2023Ranking a Set of Objects using Heterogeneous Workers: QUITE an Easy Problemcited by 0
- 2024Random pairing MLE for estimation of item parameters in Rasch modelcited by 0
- 2026What Does Preference Learning Recover from Pairwise Comparison Data?10 Feb 2026
- 2024Sequential Manipulation Against Rank Aggregation: Theory and Algorithm2 Jul 2024
- 2024Random pairing MLE for estimation of item parameters in Rasch model20 Jun 2024
- 2024An Analysis of Elo Rating Systems via Markov Chains9 Jun 2024
- 2024Top-K ranking with a monotone adversary12 Feb 2024
- 2023Ranking a Set of Objects using Heterogeneous Workers: QUITE an Easy Problem3 Oct 2023
- 2023Spectral Ranking Inferences based on General Multiway Comparisons5 Aug 2023
- 2023Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons in General Graphs and Graphs with Locality13 Apr 2023