mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

What Averages Do Not Tell -- Predicting Real Life Processes with Sequential Deep Learning

arXiv 2110.10225 ↗First posted 19 Oct 2021cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Learning is proven to be an effective tool for modeling sequential data as shown by the success in Natural Language, Computer Vision and Signal Processing. Process Mining concerns discovering insights on business processes from their execution data that are logged by supporting information systems. The logged data (event log) is formed of event sequences (traces) that correspond to executions of a process. Many Deep Learning techniques have been successfully adapted for predictive Process Mining that aims to predict process outcomes, remaining time, the next event, or even the suffix of running traces. Traces in Process Mining are multimodal sequences and very differently structured than natural language sentences or images. This may require a different approach to processing. So far, there has been little focus on these differences and the challenges introduced. Looking at suffix prediction as the most challenging of these tasks, the performance of Deep Learning models was evaluated only on average measures and for a small number of real-life event logs. Comparing the results between papers is difficult due to different pre-processing and evaluation strategies. Challenges that may be relevant are the skewness of trace-length distribution and the skewness of the activity distribution in real-life event logs. We provide an end-to-end framework which enables to compare the performance of seven state-of-the-art sequential architectures in common settings. Results show that sequence modeling still has a lot of room for improvement for majority of the more complex datasets. Further research and insights are required to get consistent performance not just in average measures but additionally over all the prefixes.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2021.

Builds on

14 of 31 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2016WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audiocited by 1,722
  4. 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 803
  5. 2019Multimodal Transformer for Unaligned Multimodal Language Sequencescited by 645
  6. 2017Tensor Fusion Network for Multimodal Sentiment Analysiscited by 433
  7. 2016Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networkscited by 104
  8. 2016Predicting Process Behaviour using Deep Learningcited by 60
  9. 2021ProcessTransformer: Predictive Business Process Monitoring with Transformer Networkcited by 37
  10. 2021A systematic literature review on state-of-the-art deep learning methods for process predictioncited by 32
  11. 2020Probabilistically Masked Language Model Capable of Autoregressive Generation in Arbitrary Word Ordercited by 28
  12. 2021A Deep Adversarial Model for Suffix and Remaining Time Prediction of Event Sequencescited by 17
2 more
  1. 2021Creating Unbiased Public Benchmark Datasets with Data Leakage Prevention for Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 16
  2. 2021Process Outcome Prediction: CNN vs. LSTM (with Attention)cited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

7 papers.