mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deconfounded Causal Collaborative Filtering

arXiv 2110.07122 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2021cs.IR cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recommender systems may be confounded by various types of confounding factors (also called confounders) that may lead to inaccurate recommendations and sacrificed recommendation performance. Current approaches to solving the problem usually design each specific model for each specific confounder. However, real-world systems may include a huge number of confounders and thus designing each specific model for each specific confounder could be unrealistic. More importantly, except for those ``explicit confounders'' that experts can manually identify and process such as item's position in the ranking list, there are also many ``latent confounders'' that are beyond the imagination of experts. For example, users' rating on a song may depend on their current mood or the current weather, and users' preference on ice creams may depend on the air temperature. Such latent confounders may be unobservable in the recorded training data. To solve the problem, we propose Deconfounded Causal Collaborative Filtering (DCCF). We first frame user behaviors with unobserved confounders into a causal graph, and then we design a front-door adjustment model carefully fused with machine learning to deconfound the influence of unobserved confounders. Experiments on real-world datasets show that our method is able to deconfound unobserved confounders to achieve better recommendation performance.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2021.

Builds on

26 of 65 references.

References · 26

  1. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 248
  2. 2016Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedbackcited by 157
  3. 2021Causal Intervention for Leveraging Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 116
  4. 2018The Blessings of Multiple Causescited by 104
  5. 2020Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Reasoning for Eliminating Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemcited by 94
  6. 2017Causal Embeddings for Recommendationcited by 79
  7. 2019Unbiased Recommender Learning from Missing-Not-At-Random Implicit Feedbackcited by 79
  8. 2021Towards Long-term Fairness in Recommendationcited by 77
  9. 2021AutoDebias: Learning to Debias for Recommendationcited by 68
  10. 2018Unbiased Learning to Rank with Unbiased Propensity Estimationcited by 61
  11. 2021Counterfactual Explainable Recommendationcited by 60
  12. 2018Graphical Models for Processing Missing Datacited by 58
14 more
  1. 2021Deconfounded Recommendation for Alleviating Bias Amplificationcited by 51
  2. 2021Personalized Counterfactual Fairness in Recommendationcited by 38
  3. 2020Correcting for Selection Bias in Learning-to-rank Systemscited by 35
  4. 2020The Connection Between Popularity Bias, Calibration, and Fairness in Recommendationcited by 35
  5. 2018Estimating Position Bias without Intrusive Interventionscited by 32
  6. 2019Asymmetric Tri-training for Debiasing Missing-Not-At-Random Explicit Feedbackcited by 28
  7. 2020Multi-sided Exposure Bias in Recommendationcited by 23
  8. 2021Top-N Recommendation with Counterfactual User Preference Simulationcited by 21
  9. 2021Correcting Exposure Bias for Link Recommendationcited by 17
  10. 2019Environment Reconstruction with Hidden Confounders for Reinforcement Learning based Recommendationcited by 16
  11. 2020Cascade Model-based Propensity Estimation for Counterfactual Learning to Rankcited by 15
  12. 2021Counterfactual Evaluation for Explainable AIcited by 15
  13. 2021Causal Collaborative Filteringcited by 13
  14. 2021CausalRec: Causal Inference for Visual Debiasing in Visually-Aware Recommendationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: