mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robust Collaborative Filtering to Popularity Distribution Shift

arXiv 2310.10696 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In leading collaborative filtering (CF) models, representations of users and items are prone to learn popularity bias in the training data as shortcuts. The popularity shortcut tricks are good for in-distribution (ID) performance but poorly generalized to out-of-distribution (OOD) data, i.e., when popularity distribution of test data shifts w.r.t. the training one. To close the gap, debiasing strategies try to assess the shortcut degrees and mitigate them from the representations. However, there exist two deficiencies: (1) when measuring the shortcut degrees, most strategies only use statistical metrics on a single aspect (i.e., item frequency on item and user frequency on user aspect), failing to accommodate the compositional degree of a user-item pair; (2) when mitigating shortcuts, many strategies assume that the test distribution is known in advance. This results in low-quality debiased representations. Worse still, these strategies achieve OOD generalizability with a sacrifice on ID performance. In this work, we present a simple yet effective debiasing strategy, PopGo, which quantifies and reduces the interaction-wise popularity shortcut without any assumptions on the test data. It first learns a shortcut model, which yields a shortcut degree of a user-item pair based on their popularity representations. Then, it trains the CF model by adjusting the predictions with the interaction-wise shortcut degrees. By taking both causal- and information-theoretical looks at PopGo, we can justify why it encourages the CF model to capture the critical popularity-agnostic features while leaving the spurious popularity-relevant patterns out. We use PopGo to debias two high-performing CF models (MF, LightGCN) on four benchmark datasets. On both ID and OOD test sets, PopGo achieves significant gains over the state-of-the-art debiasing strategies (e.g., DICE, MACR).

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2023.

Builds on

39 of 75 references.

References · 39

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2020LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendationcited by 1,139
  3. 2018Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Web-Scale Recommender Systemscited by 1,138
  4. 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,111
  5. 2019On Variational Bounds of Mutual Informationcited by 559
  6. 2016Ups and Downs: Modeling the Visual Evolution of Fashion Trends with One-Class Collaborative Filteringcited by 520
  7. 2018Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filteringcited by 310
  8. 2020Self-supervised Graph Learning for Recommendationcited by 305
  9. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 248
  10. 2020Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directionscited by 240
  11. 2021A Fine-Grained Analysis on Distribution Shiftcited by 171
  12. 2016Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedbackcited by 157
27 more
  1. 2020Neural Collaborative Filtering vs. Matrix Factorization Revisitedcited by 123
  2. 2021Causal Intervention for Leveraging Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 116
  3. 2019Knowledge-aware Graph Neural Networks with Label Smoothness Regularization for Recommender Systemscited by 107
  4. 2020Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Reasoning for Eliminating Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemcited by 94
  5. 2021UltraGCN: Ultra Simplification of Graph Convolutional Networks for Recommendationcited by 87
  6. 2021OoD-Bench: Quantifying and Understanding Two Dimensions of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 86
  7. 2017Causal Embeddings for Recommendationcited by 79
  8. 2019Unbiased Recommender Learning from Missing-Not-At-Random Implicit Feedbackcited by 79
  9. 2019Session-based Social Recommendation via Dynamic Graph Attention Networkscited by 76
  10. 2020On the Value of Out-of-Distribution Testing: An Example of Goodhart's Lawcited by 74
  11. 2019The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 70
  12. 2021AutoDebias: Learning to Debias for Recommendationcited by 68
  13. 2019POG: Personalized Outfit Generation for Fashion Recommendation at Alibaba iFashioncited by 64
  14. 2021Deconfounded Recommendation for Alleviating Bias Amplificationcited by 51
  15. 2020A Model of Two Tales: Dual Transfer Learning Framework for Improved Long-tail Item Recommendationcited by 38
  16. 2018Collaborative Memory Network for Recommendation Systemscited by 30
  17. 2020ESAM: Discriminative Domain Adaptation with Non-Displayed Items to Improve Long-Tail Performancecited by 30
  18. 2022Incorporating Bias-aware Margins into Contrastive Loss for Collaborative Filteringcited by 29
  19. 2021Introspective Distillation for Robust Question Answeringcited by 25
  20. 2023Invariant Collaborative Filtering to Popularity Distribution Shiftcited by 23
  21. 2020A Re-visit of the Popularity Baseline in Recommender Systemscited by 18
  22. 2021Item Recommendation from Implicit Feedbackcited by 18
  23. 2022CausPref: Causal Preference Learning for Out-of-Distribution Recommendationcited by 17
  24. 2019Future Data Helps Training: Modeling Future Contexts for Session-based Recommendationcited by 16
  25. 2021Deconfounded Causal Collaborative Filteringcited by 14
  26. 2020Connecting User and Item Perspectives in Popularity Debiasing for Collaborative Recommendationcited by 12
  27. 2022Debiasing Neighbor Aggregation for Graph Neural Network in Recommender Systemscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

12 papers.