Auditing Robot Learning for Safety and Compliance during Deployment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Robots of the future are going to exhibit increasingly human-like and super-human intelligence in a myriad of different tasks. They are also likely going to fail and be incompliant with human preferences in increasingly subtle ways. Towards the goal of achieving autonomous robots, the robot learning community has made rapid strides in applying machine learning techniques to train robots through data and interaction. This makes the study of how best to audit these algorithms for checking their compatibility with humans, pertinent and urgent. In this paper, we draw inspiration from the AI Safety and Alignment communities and make the case that we need to urgently consider ways in which we can best audit our robot learning algorithms to check for failure modes, and ensure that when operating autonomously, they are indeed behaving in ways that the human algorithm designers intend them to. We believe that this is a challenging problem that will require efforts from the entire robot learning community, and do not attempt to provide a concrete framework for auditing. Instead, we outline high-level guidance and a possible approach towards formulating this framework which we hope will serve as a useful starting point for thinking about auditing in the context of robot learning.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2021.
Builds on
25 of 36 references.
References · 25
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
- 2018QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 730
- 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 595
- 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 443
- 2018Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research directioncited by 438
- 2019Learning agile and dynamic motor skills for legged robotscited by 402
- 2017Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guaranteescited by 347
- 2018Learning to Drive in a Daycited by 266
- 2020Learning Agile Robotic Locomotion Skills by Imitating Animalscited by 229
- 2017Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability: A Brief Overview and Recent Advancescited by 186
13 more
- 2020Recovery RL: Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Recovery Zonescited by 156
- 2018Learning-based Model Predictive Control for Safe Explorationcited by 116
- 2020Learning to be Safe: Deep RL with a Safety Criticcited by 109
- 2020Conservative Safety Critics for Explorationcited by 107
- 2018Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning: Efficient, General, and Low-Costcited by 79
- 2021Consequences of Misaligned AIcited by 79
- 2018Shared Autonomy via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
- 2020NeurIPS 2020 Competition: Predicting Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 41
- 2020Generalization bounds for deep learningcited by 38
- 2017Should Robots be Obedient?cited by 20
- 2018Learning under Misspecified Objective Spacescited by 14
- 2019Reachability-Based Safety Guarantees using Efficient Initializationscited by 9
- 2021Auditing AI models for Verified Deployment under Semantic Specificationscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.