mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural Algorithmic Reasoners are Implicit Planners

arXiv 2110.05442 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2021cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Implicit planning has emerged as an elegant technique for combining learned models of the world with end-to-end model-free reinforcement learning. We study the class of implicit planners inspired by value iteration, an algorithm that is guaranteed to yield perfect policies in fully-specified tabular environments. We find that prior approaches either assume that the environment is provided in such a tabular form -- which is highly restrictive -- or infer "local neighbourhoods" of states to run value iteration over -- for which we discover an algorithmic bottleneck effect. This effect is caused by explicitly running the planning algorithm based on scalar predictions in every state, which can be harmful to data efficiency if such scalars are improperly predicted. We propose eXecuted Latent Value Iteration Networks (XLVINs), which alleviate the above limitations. Our method performs all planning computations in a high-dimensional latent space, breaking the algorithmic bottleneck. It maintains alignment with value iteration by carefully leveraging neural graph-algorithmic reasoning and contrastive self-supervised learning. Across eight low-data settings -- including classical control, navigation and Atari -- XLVINs provide significant improvements to data efficiency against value iteration-based implicit planners, as well as relevant model-free baselines. Lastly, we empirically verify that XLVINs can closely align with value iteration.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2021.

Builds on

30 of 52 references.

References · 30

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  4. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  5. 2018World Modelscited by 1,444
  6. 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,327
  7. 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,221
  8. 2018Recurrent World Models Facilitate Policy Evolutioncited by 761
  9. 2019Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Ataricited by 495
  10. 2020Planning to Explore via Self-Supervised World Modelscited by 365
  11. 2021Combinatorial optimization and reasoning with graph neural networkscited by 267
  12. 2019Contrastive Learning of Structured World Modelscited by 206
18 more
  1. 2019DeepMDP: Learning Continuous Latent Space Models for Representation Learningcited by 204
  2. 2018Differentiable MPC for End-to-end Planning and Controlcited by 178
  3. 2016Value Iteration Networkscited by 158
  4. 2019Unsupervised State Representation Learning in Ataricited by 144
  5. 2017Imagination-Augmented Agents for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 137
  6. 2019Neural Execution of Graph Algorithmscited by 118
  7. 2017Value Prediction Networkcited by 117
  8. 2016The Predictron: End-To-End Learning and Planningcited by 92
  9. 2021Neural Algorithmic Reasoningcited by 92
  10. 2019Discretizing Continuous Action Space for On-Policy Optimizationcited by 65
  11. 2019An investigation of model-free planningcited by 64
  12. 2020Plannable Approximations to MDP Homomorphisms: Equivariance under Actionscited by 61
  13. 2020On the role of planning in model-based deep reinforcement learningcited by 57
  14. 2018Learning to Search with MCTSnetscited by 32
  15. 2018Gated Path Planning Networkscited by 31
  16. 2017Generalized Value Iteration Networks: Life Beyond Latticescited by 16
  17. 2020Reward Propagation Using Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 15
  18. 2020Graph neural induction of value iterationcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 7; 2023: 3; 2024: 7; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022The CLRS Algorithmic Reasoning Benchmarkcited by 103
  2. 2022A Generalist Neural Algorithmic Learnercited by 58
  3. 2022Graph Neural Networks are Dynamic Programmerscited by 55
  4. 2023Neural Algorithmic Reasoning with Causal Regularisationcited by 30
  5. 2023Dual Algorithmic Reasoningcited by 21
  6. 2023Neural Algorithmic Reasoning for Combinatorial Optimisationcited by 19
  7. 2024Graph Reinforcement Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: A Survey and Unifying Perspectivecited by 16
  8. 2022Neural Set Function Extensions: Learning with Discrete Functions in High Dimensionscited by 14
  9. 2024PUZZLES: A Benchmark for Neural Algorithmic Reasoningcited by 12
  10. 2024On the Markov Property of Neural Algorithmic Reasoning: Analyses and Methodscited by 10
  11. 2025Primal-Dual Neural Algorithmic Reasoningcited by 8
  12. 2022Integrating Symmetry into Differentiable Planning with Steerable Convolutionscited by 6
9 more
  1. 2022Scaling up and Stabilizing Differentiable Planning with Implicit Differentiationcited by 6
  2. 2024Recurrent Aggregators in Neural Algorithmic Reasoningcited by 6
  3. 2024Are Large-Language Models Graph Algorithmic Reasoners?cited by 5
  4. 2022Continuous Neural Algorithmic Plannerscited by 4
  5. 2024NAR-*ICP: Neural Execution of Classical ICP-based Pointcloud Registration Algorithmscited by 2
  6. 2024Open-Book Neural Algorithmic Reasoningcited by 2
  7. 2025Tackling GNARLy Problems: Graph Neural Algorithmic Reasoning Reimagined through Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  8. 2025Leveraging Classical Algorithms for Graph Neural Networkscited by 0
  9. 2026Richer Representations for Neural Algorithmic Reasoning via Auxiliary Reconstructioncited by 0