mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Perceived and Intended Sarcasm Detection with Graph Attention Networks

arXiv 2110.04001 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2021cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing sarcasm detection systems focus on exploiting linguistic markers, context, or user-level priors. However, social studies suggest that the relationship between the author and the audience can be equally relevant for the sarcasm usage and interpretation. In this work, we propose a framework jointly leveraging (1) a user context from their historical tweets together with (2) the social information from a user's conversational neighborhood in an interaction graph, to contextualize the interpretation of the post. We use graph attention networks (GAT) over users and tweets in a conversation thread, combined with dense user history representations. Apart from achieving state-of-the-art results on the recently published dataset of 19k Twitter users with 30K labeled tweets, adding 10M unlabeled tweets as context, our results indicate that the model contributes to interpreting the sarcastic intentions of an author more than to predicting the sarcasm perception by others.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2021.

Builds on

18 of 56 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  4. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  5. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  6. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,918
  7. 2014Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documentscited by 678
  8. 2017Network Embedding as Matrix Factorization: Unifying DeepWalk, LINE, PTE, and node2veccited by 198
  9. 2019Predictive Biases in Natural Language Processing Models: A Conceptual Framework and Overviewcited by 137
  10. 2018Spread of hate speech in online social mediacited by 59
  11. 2018Reasoning with Sarcasm by Reading In-betweencited by 38
  12. 2016Modelling Context with User Embeddings for Sarcasm Detection in Social Mediacited by 26
6 more
  1. 2018CASCADE: Contextual Sarcasm Detection in Online Discussion Forumscited by 26
  2. 2018Leveraging Intra-User and Inter-User Representation Learning for Automated Hate Speech Detectioncited by 25
  3. 2020Graph-based Modeling of Online Communities for Fake News Detectioncited by 21
  4. 2019Exploring Author Context for Detecting Intended vs Perceived Sarcasmcited by 7
  5. 2020Reactive Supervision: A New Method for Collecting Sarcasm Datacited by 4
  6. 2017Contextual Consent: Ethical Mining of Social Media for Health Researchcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3.

3 papers.