mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exploring Author Context for Detecting Intended vs Perceived Sarcasm

arXiv 1910.11932 ↗First posted 25 Oct 2019cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the impact of using author context on textual sarcasm detection. We define author context as the embedded representation of their historical posts on Twitter and suggest neural models that extract these representations. We experiment with two tweet datasets, one labelled manually for sarcasm, and the other via tag-based distant supervision. We achieve state-of-the-art performance on the second dataset, but not on the one labelled manually, indicating a difference between intended sarcasm, captured by distant supervision, and perceived sarcasm, captured by manual labelling.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

7 papers.