mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Automatic Discovery and Description of Human Planning Strategies

arXiv 2109.14493 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2021cs.AI cs.CY cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific discovery concerns finding patterns in data and creating insightful hypotheses that explain these patterns. Traditionally, this process required human ingenuity, but with the galloping advances in artificial intelligence (AI) it becomes feasible to automate some parts of scientific discovery. In this work we leverage AI for strategy discovery for understanding human planning. In the state-of-the-art methods data about the process of human planning is often used to group similar behaviors together and formulate verbal descriptions of the strategies which might underlie those groups. Here, we automate these two steps. Our method utilizes a new algorithm, called Human-Interpret, that performs imitation learning to describe sequences of planning operations in terms of a procedural formula and then translates that formula to natural language. We test our method on a benchmark data set that researchers have previously scrutinized manually. We find that the descriptions of human planning strategies obtained automatically are about as understandable as human-generated descriptions. They also cover a substantial proportion of of relevant types of human planning strategies that had been discovered manually. Our method saves scientists' time and effort as all the reasoning about human planning is done automatically. This might make it feasible to more rapidly scale up the search for yet undiscovered cognitive strategies to many new decision environments, populations, tasks, and domains. Given these results, we believe that the presented work may accelerate scientific discovery in psychology, and due to its generality, extend to problems from other fields.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2021.

Builds on

9 of 78 references.

References · 9

  1. 2018Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Functioncited by 734
  2. 2018An Algorithmic Perspective on Imitation Learningcited by 455
  3. 2018Programmatically Interpretable Reinforcement Learningcited by 192
  4. 2019Variational Bayesian Optimal Experimental Designcited by 116
  5. 2018Toward Interpretable Deep Reinforcement Learning with Linear Model U-Treescited by 65
  6. 2019Few-Shot Bayesian Imitation Learning with Logical Program Policiescited by 30
  7. 2020Automatic Discovery of Interpretable Planning Strategiescited by 9
  8. 2016Practical optimal experiment design with probabilistic programscited by 5
  9. 2021Improving Human Decision-Making by Discovering Efficient Strategies for Hierarchical Planningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery
  2. 2023Learning a Hierarchical Planner from Humans in Multiple Generations
  3. 2026Intentmaking and Sensemaking: Human Interaction with AI-Guided Mathematical Discovery
  4. 2024Revealing the Barriers of Language Agents in Planning
  5. 2025AI-Researcher: Autonomous Scientific Innovation
  6. 2026Hypothesis-guided discovery of cognitive algorithms via program refinement
  7. 2020Order Matters: Generating Progressive Explanations for Planning Tasks in Human-Robot Teaming
  8. 2023On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models (A Critical Investigation with a Proposed Benchmark)