Order Matters: Generating Progressive Explanations for Planning Tasks in Human-Robot Teaming
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Prior work on generating explanations in a planning and decision-making context has focused on providing the rationale behind an AI agent's decision making. While these methods provide the right explanations from the explainer's perspective, they fail to heed the cognitive requirement of understanding an explanation from the explainee's (the human's) perspective. In this work, we set out to address this issue by first considering the influence of information order in an explanation, or the progressiveness of explanations. Intuitively, progression builds later concepts on previous ones and is known to contribute to better learning. In this work, we aim to investigate similar effects during explanation generation when an explanation is broken into multiple parts that are communicated sequentially. The challenge here lies in modeling the humans' preferences for information order in receiving such explanations to assist understanding. Given this sequential process, a formulation based on goal-based MDP for generating progressive explanations is presented. The reward function of this MDP is learned via inverse reinforcement learning based on explanations that are retrieved via human subject studies. We first evaluated our approach on a scavenger-hunt domain to demonstrate its effectively in capturing the humans' preferences. Upon analyzing the results, it revealed something more fundamental: the preferences arise strongly from both domain dependent and independence features. The correlation with domain independent features pushed us to verify this result further in an escape room domain. Results confirmed our hypothesis that the process of understanding an explanation was a dynamic process. The human preference that reflected this aspect corresponded exactly to the progression for knowledge assimilation hidden deeper in our cognitive process.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024SumRecom: A Personalized Summarization Approach by Learning from Users' Feedbackcited by 4
- 2022Intent Recognition in Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 2
- 2024Explanation, Debate, Align: A Weak-to-Strong Framework for Language Model Generalizationcited by 1
- 2025Informative Communication of Robot Planscited by 0
- 2025Informative Communication of Robot Plans17 Nov 2025
- 2024Explanation, Debate, Align: A Weak-to-Strong Framework for Language Model Generalization11 Sep 2024
- 2024SumRecom: A Personalized Summarization Approach by Learning from Users' Feedback2 Aug 2024
- 2022Intent Recognition in Conversational Recommender Systems6 Dec 2022
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Multi-Agent Strategy Explanations for Human-Robot Collaboration
- 2026Exploring Plan Space through Conversation: An Agentic Framework for LLM-Mediated Explanations in Planning
- 2023A Closer Look at Reward Decomposition for High-Level Robotic Explanations
- 2023Inferring the Goals of Communicating Agents from Actions and Instructions
- 2025Effective Explanations for Belief-Desire-Intention Robots: When and What to Explain
- 2025Translate Policy to Language: Flow Matching Generated Rewards for LLM Explanations
- 2026Shaping Scientific Explanations to Expert Perspectives with Persona-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Theory of Mind in Action: The Instruction Inference Task in Dynamic Human-Agent Collaboration