mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Intentmaking and Sensemaking: Human Interaction with AI-Guided Mathematical Discovery

arXiv 2605.05921 ↗First posted 7 May 2026cs.AI cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence offers powerful new tools for scientific discovery, but the interaction paradigms required to effectively harness these systems remain underexplored. In this paper, we present findings from a formative user study with 11 expert mathematicians who used AlphaEvolve, an evolutionary coding agent, to tackle advanced problems in their fields of expertise. We identify and characterize a distinct workflow we term intentmaking, the iterative process of discovering, defining, and refining one's experimental goals through active system interaction. We frame this as a natural extension to sensemaking, the cognitive process of building an understanding of complex or novel data. We suggest that users enter a cycle of intentmaking (defining and updating their experiment) and sensemaking (interpreting the results) which repeats many times during the course of an investigation. Our documentation of these themes suggests an approach to designing AI tools for scientific discovery that goes beyond the existing question/answer model of many current systems, treating them as collaborative instruments rather than opaque black-box assistants.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

Builds on

11 of 41 references.

References · 11

  1. 2025Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistantscited by 413
  2. 2018AI safety via debatecited by 393
  3. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 298
  4. 2017AI Safety Gridworldscited by 108
  5. 2023Bridging the Gulf of Envisioning: Cognitive Design Challenges in LLM Interfacescited by 72
  6. 2025Mathematical exploration and discovery at scalecited by 69
  7. 2024Cocoa: Co-Planning and Co-Execution with AI Agentscited by 38
  8. 2023Interactive AI Alignment: Specification, Process, and Evaluation Alignmentcited by 22
  9. 2024Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignmentcited by 15
  10. 2024CoPrompter: User-Centric Evaluation of LLM Instruction Alignment for Improved Prompt Engineeringcited by 8
  11. 2026Evolving Ranking Functions for Canonical Blow-Ups in Positive Characteristiccited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025AI-Researcher: Autonomous Scientific Innovation
  2. 2025AI Mathematician as a Partner in Advancing Mathematical Discovery -- A Case Study in Homogenization Theory
  3. 2026ReasFlow: Assisting Reasoning-Centric Scientific Discovery in Applied Mathematics via a Knowledge-Based Multi-Agent System
  4. 2026Harnessing the Collective Intelligence of AI Agents in the Wild for New Discoveries
  5. 2026Agentic Neurosymbolic Collaboration for Mathematical Discovery: A Case Study in Combinatorial Design
  6. 2026Hypothesis-guided discovery of cognitive algorithms via program refinement
  7. 2026The Agentic Researcher: A Practical Guide to AI-Assisted Research in Mathematics and Machine Learning
  8. 2025A Matter of Interest: Understanding Interestingness of Math Problems in Humans and Language Models