mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Estimation Bias in Double Q-Learning

arXiv 2109.14419 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2021cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Double Q-learning is a classical method for reducing overestimation bias, which is caused by taking maximum estimated values in the Bellman operation. Its variants in the deep Q-learning paradigm have shown great promise in producing reliable value prediction and improving learning performance. However, as shown by prior work, double Q-learning is not fully unbiased and suffers from underestimation bias. In this paper, we show that such underestimation bias may lead to multiple non-optimal fixed points under an approximate Bellman operator. To address the concerns of converging to non-optimal stationary solutions, we propose a simple but effective approach as a partial fix for the underestimation bias in double Q-learning. This approach leverages an approximate dynamic programming to bound the target value. We extensively evaluate our proposed method in the Atari benchmark tasks and demonstrate its significant improvement over baseline algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2021.

Builds on

33 of 66 references.

References · 33

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  3. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  4. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  5. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  6. 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,227
  7. 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 774
  8. 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 769
  9. 2018QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 730
  10. 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 284
  11. 2021Randomized Ensembled Double Q-Learning: Learning Fast Without a Modelcited by 278
  12. 2015Escaping From Saddle Points --- Online Stochastic Gradient for Tensor Decompositioncited by 241
21 more
  1. 2018Optimization of Molecules via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 199
  2. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning and the Deadly Triadcited by 170
  3. 2020Controlling Overestimation Bias with Truncated Mixture of Continuous Distributional Quantile Criticscited by 154
  4. 2017Neural Episodic Controlcited by 148
  5. 2015Taming the Noise in Reinforcement Learning via Soft Updatescited by 125
  6. 2018Dopamine: A Research Framework for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 121
  7. 2020Maxmin Q-learning: Controlling the Estimation Bias of Q-learningcited by 117
  8. 2016Averaged-DQN: Variance Reduction and Stabilization for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 106
  9. 2016Model-Free Episodic Controlcited by 100
  10. 2019Better Exploration with Optimistic Actor-Criticcited by 88
  11. 2020Provably Good Batch Reinforcement Learning Without Great Explorationcited by 77
  12. 2019Diagnosing Bottlenecks in Deep Q-learning Algorithmscited by 73
  13. 2019Towards Characterizing Divergence in Deep Q-Learningcited by 43
  14. 2018Episodic Memory Deep Q-Networkscited by 41
  15. 2021Generalizable Episodic Memory for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
  16. 2019Reinforcement Learning with Dynamic Boltzmann Softmax Updatescited by 14
  17. 2020Finite-Time Analysis for Double Q-learningcited by 12
  18. 2020The Mean-Squared Error of Double Q-Learningcited by 11
  19. 2020Self-correcting Q-Learningcited by 9
  20. 2020Distributed Reinforcement Learning of Targeted Grasping with Active Vision for Mobile Manipulatorscited by 7
  21. 2020Decorrelated Double Q-learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.