mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Shaking Syntactic Trees on the Sesame Street: Multilingual Probing with Controllable Perturbations

arXiv 2109.14017 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2021cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent research has adopted a new experimental field centered around the concept of text perturbations which has revealed that shuffled word order has little to no impact on the downstream performance of Transformer-based language models across many NLP tasks. These findings contradict the common understanding of how the models encode hierarchical and structural information and even question if the word order is modeled with position embeddings. To this end, this paper proposes nine probing datasets organized by the type of controllable text perturbation for three Indo-European languages with a varying degree of word order flexibility: English, Swedish and Russian. Based on the probing analysis of the M-BERT and M-BART models, we report that the syntactic sensitivity depends on the language and model pre-training objectives. We also find that the sensitivity grows across layers together with the increase of the perturbation granularity. Last but not least, we show that the models barely use the positional information to induce syntactic trees from their intermediate self-attention and contextualized representations.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2021.

Builds on

55 of 80 references.

References · 55

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  5. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  6. 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,035
  7. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
  8. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 958
  9. 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 815
  10. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
  11. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
  12. 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 457
38 more
  1. 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 438
  2. 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 383
  3. 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 320
  4. 2018Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 277
  5. 2019Assessing BERT's Syntactic Abilitiescited by 192
  6. 2021Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Littlecited by 177
  7. 2019Neural Language Models as Psycholinguistic Subjects: Representations of Syntactic Statecited by 138
  8. 2019Open Sesame: Getting Inside BERT's Linguistic Knowledgecited by 120
  9. 2018Sharp Nearby, Fuzzy Far Away: How Neural Language Models Use Contextcited by 113
  10. 2019StructBERT: Incorporating Language Structures into Pre-training for Deep Language Understandingcited by 109
  11. 2020Perturbed Masking: Parameter-free Probing for Analyzing and Interpreting BERTcited by 109
  12. 2021Position Information in Transformers: An Overviewcited by 103
  13. 2016Learning Distributed Representations of Sentences from Unlabelled Datacited by 91
  14. 2019Do Attention Heads in BERT Track Syntactic Dependencies?cited by 88
  15. 2020Out of Order: How Important Is The Sequential Order of Words in a Sentence in Natural Language Understanding Tasks?cited by 73
  16. 2020UnNatural Language Inferencecited by 69
  17. 2020What Do Position Embeddings Learn? An Empirical Study of Pre-Trained Language Model Positional Encodingcited by 52
  18. 2021Syntax-BERT: Improving Pre-trained Transformers with Syntax Treescited by 51
  19. 2021What Context Features Can Transformer Language Models Use?cited by 50
  20. 2020A Survey on Contextual Embeddingscited by 48
  21. 2020Do Syntax Trees Help Pre-trained Transformers Extract Information?cited by 48
  22. 2019Do Neural Dialog Systems Use the Conversation History Effectively? An Empirical Studycited by 47
  23. 2020Are Pre-trained Language Models Aware of Phrases? Simple but Strong Baselines for Grammar Inductioncited by 47
  24. 2019Assessing the Benchmarking Capacity of Machine Reading Comprehension Datasetscited by 46
  25. 2021CLiMP: A Benchmark for Chinese Language Model Evaluationcited by 46
  26. 2019Data Augmentation via Dependency Tree Morphing for Low-Resource Languagescited by 45
  27. 2021BERT & Family Eat Word Salad: Experiments with Text Understandingcited by 44
  28. 2020Positional Artefacts Propagate Through Masked Language Model Embeddingscited by 35
  29. 2019What does BERT Learn from Multiple-Choice Reading Comprehension Datasets?cited by 30
  30. 2021Do Syntactic Probes Probe Syntax? Experiments with Jabberwocky Probingcited by 28
  31. 2018Analyzing Compositionality-Sensitivity of NLI Modelscited by 26
  32. 2020How Furiously Can Colourless Green Ideas Sleep? Sentence Acceptability in Contextcited by 26
  33. 2018RNNs as psycholinguistic subjects: Syntactic state and grammatical dependencycited by 23
  34. 2020Linguistic Profiling of a Neural Language Modelcited by 23
  35. 2019LINSPECTOR: Multilingual Probing Tasks for Word Representationscited by 22
  36. 2020Parsing as Pretrainingcited by 19
  37. 2021DaLAJ - a dataset for linguistic acceptability judgments for Swedish: Format, baseline, sharingcited by 16
  38. 2021Syntactic Perturbations Reveal Representational Correlates of Hierarchical Phrase Structure in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 14

50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

10 papers.