Shaking Syntactic Trees on the Sesame Street: Multilingual Probing with Controllable Perturbations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent research has adopted a new experimental field centered around the concept of text perturbations which has revealed that shuffled word order has little to no impact on the downstream performance of Transformer-based language models across many NLP tasks. These findings contradict the common understanding of how the models encode hierarchical and structural information and even question if the word order is modeled with position embeddings. To this end, this paper proposes nine probing datasets organized by the type of controllable text perturbation for three Indo-European languages with a varying degree of word order flexibility: English, Swedish and Russian. Based on the probing analysis of the M-BERT and M-BART models, we report that the syntactic sensitivity depends on the language and model pre-training objectives. We also find that the sensitivity grows across layers together with the increase of the perturbation granularity. Last but not least, we show that the models barely use the positional information to induce syntactic trees from their intermediate self-attention and contextualized representations.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2021.
Builds on
55 of 80 references.
References · 55
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,035
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
- 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 958
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 815
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 457
38 more
- 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 438
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 383
- 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 320
- 2018Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 277
- 2019Assessing BERT's Syntactic Abilitiescited by 192
- 2021Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Littlecited by 177
- 2019Neural Language Models as Psycholinguistic Subjects: Representations of Syntactic Statecited by 138
- 2019Open Sesame: Getting Inside BERT's Linguistic Knowledgecited by 120
- 2018Sharp Nearby, Fuzzy Far Away: How Neural Language Models Use Contextcited by 113
- 2019StructBERT: Incorporating Language Structures into Pre-training for Deep Language Understandingcited by 109
- 2020Perturbed Masking: Parameter-free Probing for Analyzing and Interpreting BERTcited by 109
- 2021Position Information in Transformers: An Overviewcited by 103
- 2016Learning Distributed Representations of Sentences from Unlabelled Datacited by 91
- 2019Do Attention Heads in BERT Track Syntactic Dependencies?cited by 88
- 2020Out of Order: How Important Is The Sequential Order of Words in a Sentence in Natural Language Understanding Tasks?cited by 73
- 2020UnNatural Language Inferencecited by 69
- 2020What Do Position Embeddings Learn? An Empirical Study of Pre-Trained Language Model Positional Encodingcited by 52
- 2021Syntax-BERT: Improving Pre-trained Transformers with Syntax Treescited by 51
- 2021What Context Features Can Transformer Language Models Use?cited by 50
- 2020A Survey on Contextual Embeddingscited by 48
- 2020Do Syntax Trees Help Pre-trained Transformers Extract Information?cited by 48
- 2019Do Neural Dialog Systems Use the Conversation History Effectively? An Empirical Studycited by 47
- 2020Are Pre-trained Language Models Aware of Phrases? Simple but Strong Baselines for Grammar Inductioncited by 47
- 2019Assessing the Benchmarking Capacity of Machine Reading Comprehension Datasetscited by 46
- 2021CLiMP: A Benchmark for Chinese Language Model Evaluationcited by 46
- 2019Data Augmentation via Dependency Tree Morphing for Low-Resource Languagescited by 45
- 2021BERT & Family Eat Word Salad: Experiments with Text Understandingcited by 44
- 2020Positional Artefacts Propagate Through Masked Language Model Embeddingscited by 35
- 2019What does BERT Learn from Multiple-Choice Reading Comprehension Datasets?cited by 30
- 2021Do Syntactic Probes Probe Syntax? Experiments with Jabberwocky Probingcited by 28
- 2018Analyzing Compositionality-Sensitivity of NLI Modelscited by 26
- 2020How Furiously Can Colourless Green Ideas Sleep? Sentence Acceptability in Contextcited by 26
- 2018RNNs as psycholinguistic subjects: Syntactic state and grammatical dependencycited by 23
- 2020Linguistic Profiling of a Neural Language Modelcited by 23
- 2019LINSPECTOR: Multilingual Probing Tasks for Word Representationscited by 22
- 2020Parsing as Pretrainingcited by 19
- 2021DaLAJ - a dataset for linguistic acceptability judgments for Swedish: Format, baseline, sharingcited by 16
- 2021Syntactic Perturbations Reveal Representational Correlates of Hierarchical Phrase Structure in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 14
50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2024Probing the Emergence of Cross-lingual Alignment during LLM Trainingcited by 39
- 2022Analyzing the Mono- and Cross-Lingual Pretraining Dynamics of Multilingual Language Modelscited by 32
- 2024Exploring Multilingual Probing in Large Language Models: A Cross-Language Analysiscited by 12
- 2025Linguistic Interpretability of Transformer-based Language Models: a systematic reviewcited by 7
- 2023Can BERT eat RuCoLA? Topological Data Analysis to Explaincited by 5
- 2023Distributional Data Augmentation Methods for Low Resource Languagecited by 4
- 2022Detecting Languages Unintelligible to Multilingual Models through Local Structure Probescited by 2
- 2022Local Structure Matters Most in Most Languagescited by 1
- 2026The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 1
- 2022How Does Data Corruption Affect Natural Language Understanding Models? A Study on GLUE datasetscited by 0
- 2026The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Models9 Jan 2026
- 2025Linguistic Interpretability of Transformer-based Language Models: a systematic review9 Apr 2025
- 2024Exploring Multilingual Probing in Large Language Models: A Cross-Language Analysis22 Sep 2024
- 2024Probing the Emergence of Cross-lingual Alignment during LLM Training19 Jun 2024
- 2023Distributional Data Augmentation Methods for Low Resource Language9 Sep 2023
- 2023Can BERT eat RuCoLA? Topological Data Analysis to Explain4 Apr 2023
- 2022Local Structure Matters Most in Most Languages9 Nov 2022
- 2022Detecting Languages Unintelligible to Multilingual Models through Local Structure Probes9 Nov 2022
- 2022Analyzing the Mono- and Cross-Lingual Pretraining Dynamics of Multilingual Language Models24 May 2022
- 2022How Does Data Corruption Affect Natural Language Understanding Models? A Study on GLUE datasets12 Jan 2022