mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RNNs as psycholinguistic subjects: Syntactic state and grammatical dependency

arXiv 1809.01329 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2018cs.CLcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are the state of the art in sequence modeling for natural language. However, it remains poorly understood what grammatical characteristics of natural language they implicitly learn and represent as a consequence of optimizing the language modeling objective. Here we deploy the methods of controlled psycholinguistic experimentation to shed light on to what extent RNN behavior reflects incremental syntactic state and grammatical dependency representations known to characterize human linguistic behavior. We broadly test two publicly available long short-term memory (LSTM) English sequence models, and learn and test a new Japanese LSTM. We demonstrate that these models represent and maintain incremental syntactic state, but that they do not always generalize in the same way as humans. Furthermore, none of our models learn the appropriate grammatical dependency configurations licensing reflexive pronouns or negative polarity items.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 8; 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Do Large Language Models know what humans know?cited by 60
  2. 2022Can language models handle recursively nested grammatical structures? A case study on comparing models and humanscited by 41
  3. 2021A Targeted Assessment of Incremental Processing in Neural LanguageModels and Humanscited by 32
  4. 2023Dissociating language and thought in large language modelscited by 27
  5. 2021Accounting for Agreement Phenomena in Sentence Comprehension with Transformer Language Models: Effects of Similarity-based Interference on Surprisal and Attentioncited by 26
  6. 2021How much pretraining data do language models need to learn syntax?cited by 21
  7. 2021The Language Model Understood the Prompt was Ambiguous: Probing Syntactic Uncertainty Through Generationcited by 15
  8. 2022SLING: Sino Linguistic Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 15
  9. 2021Syntactic Perturbations Reveal Representational Correlates of Hierarchical Phrase Structure in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 14
  10. 2021Shaking Syntactic Trees on the Sesame Street: Multilingual Probing with Controllable Perturbationscited by 10
  11. 2024Controlled Evaluation of Syntactic Knowledge in Multilingual Language Modelscited by 10
  12. 2021Can RNNs learn Recursive Nested Subject-Verb Agreements?cited by 9
11 more
  1. 2022Characterizing Verbatim Short-Term Memory in Neural Language Modelscited by 8
  2. 2021Assessing the Syntactic Capabilities of Transformer-based Multilingual Language Modelscited by 7
  3. 2026Clause-Internal or Clause-External? Testing Turkish Reflexive Binding in Adapted versus Chain of Thought Large Language Modelscited by 3
  4. 2026Learning is Forgetting: LLM Training As Lossy Compressioncited by 3
  5. 2023Spelling convention sensitivity in neural language modelscited by 1
  6. 2024Representations as Language: An Information-Theoretic Framework for Interpretabilitycited by 1
  7. 2024Linguistic Minimal Pairs Elicit Linguistic Similarity in Large Language Modelscited by 1
  8. 2025Language Models Largely Exhibit Human-like Constituent Ordering Preferencescited by 1
  9. 2022Assessing the Limits of the Distributional Hypothesis in Semantic Spaces: Trait-based Relational Knowledge and the Impact of Co-occurrencescited by 0
  10. 2023Interpretable Sentence Representation with Variational Autoencoders and Attentioncited by 0
  11. 2024FAC2E: Better Understanding Large Language Model Capabilities by Dissociating Language and Cognitioncited by 0