mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

DynG2G: An Efficient Stochastic Graph Embedding Method for Temporal Graphs

arXiv 2109.13441 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Dynamic graph embedding has gained great attention recently due to its capability of learning low dimensional graph representations for complex temporal graphs with high accuracy. However, recent advances mostly focus on learning node embeddings as deterministic "vectors" for static graphs yet disregarding the key graph temporal dynamics and the evolving uncertainties associated with node embedding in the latent space. In this work, we propose an efficient stochastic dynamic graph embedding method (DynG2G) that applies an inductive feed-forward encoder trained with node triplet-based contrastive loss. Every node per timestamp is encoded as a time-dependent probabilistic multivariate Gaussian distribution in the latent space, hence we can quantify the node embedding uncertainty on-the-fly. We adopted eight different benchmarks that represent diversity in size (from 96 nodes to 87,626 and from 13,398 edges to 4,870,863) and diversity in dynamics. We demonstrate via extensive experiments on these eight dynamic graph benchmarks that DynG2G achieves new state-of-the-art performance in capturing the underlying temporal node embeddings. We also demonstrate that DynG2G can predict the evolving node embedding uncertainty, which plays a crucial role in quantifying the intrinsic dimensionality of the dynamical system over time. We obtain a universal relation of the optimal embedding dimension, Lo, versus the effective dimensionality of uncertainty, Du, and we infer that Lo=Du for all cases. This implies that the uncertainty quantification approach we employ in the DynG2G correctly captures the intrinsic dimensionality of the dynamics of such evolving graphs despite the diverse nature and composition of the graphs at each timestamp. Moreover, this L0 - Du correlation provides a clear path to select adaptively the optimum embedding size at each timestamp by setting L ≥ Du.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2021.

Builds on

19 of 39 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,318
  2. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,360
  3. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,911
  4. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,915
  5. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,544
  6. 2020A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applicationscited by 643
  7. 2020Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 525
  8. 2019EvolveGCN: Evolving Graph Convolutional Networks for Dynamic Graphscited by 445
  9. 2017Deep Gaussian Embedding of Graphs: Unsupervised Inductive Learning via Rankingcited by 333
  10. 2015Net2Net: Accelerating Learning via Knowledge Transfercited by 246
  11. 2018DynGEM: Deep Embedding Method for Dynamic Graphscited by 101
  12. 2018dyngraph2vec: Capturing Network Dynamics using Dynamic Graph Representation Learningcited by 88
7 more
  1. 2019Learning the Graphical Structure of Electronic Health Records with Graph Convolutional Transformercited by 88
  2. 2020Understanding graph embedding methods and their applicationscited by 50
  3. 2019Node Embedding over Temporal Graphscited by 45
  4. 2018dynnode2vec: Scalable Dynamic Network Embeddingcited by 32
  5. 2017TIMERS: Error-Bounded SVD Restart on Dynamic Networkscited by 19
  6. 2020A Graph Gaussian Embedding Method for Predicting Alzheimer's Disease Progression with MEG Brain Networkscited by 11
  7. 2020A Survey on Dynamic Network Embeddingcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

8 papers.