A Survey on Dynamic Network Embedding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Real-world networks are composed of diverse interacting and evolving entities, while most of existing researches simply characterize them as particular static networks, without consideration of the evolution trend in dynamic networks. Recently, significant progresses in tracking the properties of dynamic networks have been made, which exploit changes of entities and links in the network to devise network embedding techniques. Compared to widely proposed static network embedding methods, dynamic network embedding endeavors to encode nodes as low-dimensional dense representations that effectively preserve the network structures and the temporal dynamics, which is beneficial to multifarious downstream machine learning tasks. In this paper, we conduct a systematical survey on dynamic network embedding. In specific, basic concepts of dynamic network embedding are described, notably, we propose a novel taxonomy of existing dynamic network embedding techniques for the first time, including matrix factorization based, Skip-Gram based, autoencoder based, neural networks based and other embedding methods. Additionally, we carefully summarize the commonly used datasets and a wide variety of subsequent tasks that dynamic network embedding can benefit. Afterwards and primarily, we suggest several challenges that the existing algorithms faced and outline possible directions to facilitate the future research, such as dynamic embedding models, large-scale dynamic networks, heterogeneous dynamic networks, dynamic attributed networks, task-oriented dynamic network embedding and more embedding spaces.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
11 papers.
- 2022A Survey on Graph Representation Learning Methodscited by 66
- 2023Graph Neural Networks for temporal graphs: State of the art, open challenges, and opportunitiescited by 61
- 2021A Survey on Embedding Dynamic Graphscited by 60
- 2021Dynamic Network Embedding Surveycited by 44
- 2021Spectral embedding for dynamic networks with stability guaranteescited by 13
- 2022A Mutually Exciting Latent Space Hawkes Process Model for Continuous-time Networkscited by 10
- 2023TransformerG2G: Adaptive time-stepping for learning temporal graph embeddings using transformerscited by 9
- 2021DynG2G: An Efficient Stochastic Graph Embedding Method for Temporal Graphscited by 8
- 2024A Community Detection and Graph Neural Network Based Link Prediction Approach for Scientific Literaturecited by 6
- 2021Network Representation Learning: From Traditional Feature Learning to Deep Learningcited by 3
- 2021Missing Data Estimation in Temporal Multilayer Position-aware Graph Neural Network (TMP-GNN)cited by 0
- 2024A Community Detection and Graph Neural Network Based Link Prediction Approach for Scientific Literature4 Jan 2024
- 2023TransformerG2G: Adaptive time-stepping for learning temporal graph embeddings using transformers5 Jul 2023
- 2023Graph Neural Networks for temporal graphs: State of the art, open challenges, and opportunities2 Feb 2023
- 2022A Mutually Exciting Latent Space Hawkes Process Model for Continuous-time Networks19 May 2022
- 2022A Survey on Graph Representation Learning Methods4 Apr 2022
- 2021DynG2G: An Efficient Stochastic Graph Embedding Method for Temporal Graphs28 Sep 2021
- 2021Missing Data Estimation in Temporal Multilayer Position-aware Graph Neural Network (TMP-GNN)7 Aug 2021
- 2021Spectral embedding for dynamic networks with stability guarantees2 Jun 2021
- 2021Dynamic Network Embedding Survey29 Mar 2021
- 2021Network Representation Learning: From Traditional Feature Learning to Deep Learning7 Mar 2021
- 2021A Survey on Embedding Dynamic Graphs4 Jan 2021