Adversarial Transfer Attacks With Unknown Data and Class Overlap
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The ability to transfer adversarial attacks from one model (the surrogate) to another model (the victim) has been an issue of concern within the machine learning (ML) community. The ability to successfully evade unseen models represents an uncomfortable level of ease toward implementing attacks. In this work we note that as studied, current transfer attack research has an unrealistic advantage for the attacker: the attacker has the exact same training data as the victim. We present the first study of transferring adversarial attacks focusing on the data available to attacker and victim under imperfect settings without querying the victim, where there is some variable level of overlap in the exact data used or in the classes learned by each model. This threat model is relevant to applications in medicine, malware, and others. Under this new threat model attack success rate is not correlated with data or class overlap in the way one would expect, and varies with dataset. This makes it difficult for attacker and defender to reason about each other and contributes to the broader study of model robustness and security. We remedy this by developing a masked version of Projected Gradient Descent that simulates class disparity, which enables the attacker to reliably estimate a lower-bound on their attack's success.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2021.
Builds on
25 of 45 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 591
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
- 2019Evading Defenses to Transferable Adversarial Examples by Translation-Invariant Attackscited by 440
- 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 439
- 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 411
- 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
13 more
- 2018EMBER: An Open Dataset for Training Static PE Malware Machine Learning Modelscited by 164
- 2017The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examplescited by 156
- 2019Improving Black-box Adversarial Attacks with a Transfer-based Priorcited by 121
- 2018Technical Report: When Does Machine Learning FAIL? Generalized Transferability for Evasion and Poisoning Attackscited by 78
- 2019Improving Adversarial Robustness of Ensembles with Diversity Trainingcited by 69
- 2018Adversarial Attacks Against Medical Deep Learning Systemscited by 61
- 2018Adversarial Malware Binaries: Evading Deep Learning for Malware Detection in Executablescited by 60
- 2017Security Evaluation of Pattern Classifiers under Attackcited by 39
- 2020A Survey of Machine Learning Methods and Challenges for Windows Malware Classificationcited by 33
- 2020AVClass2: Massive Malware Tag Extraction from AV Labelscited by 19
- 2018Adversarial Attacks, Regression, and Numerical Stability Regularizationcited by 14
- 2017Personalized Automatic Estimation of Self-reported Pain Intensity from Facial Expressionscited by 9
- 2019Dynamics are Important for the Recognition of Equine Pain in Videocited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2022DISCO: Adversarial Defense with Local Implicit Functionscited by 33
- 2023SoK: Pitfalls in Evaluating Black-Box Attackscited by 6
- 2023You Don't Need Robust Machine Learning to Manage Adversarial Attack Riskscited by 3
- 2025Stop Walking in Circles! Bailing Out Early in Projected Gradient Descentcited by 2
- 2025Text Adversarial Attacks with Dynamic Outputscited by 2
- 2024Probing Human Visual Robustness with Neurally-Guided Deep Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2025Multi-task Adversarial Attacks against Black-box Model with Few-shot Queriescited by 1
- 2026Adversarial Samples Are Not Created Equalcited by 0
- 2026Adversarial Samples Are Not Created Equal2 Jan 2026
- 2025Text Adversarial Attacks with Dynamic Outputs26 Sep 2025
- 2025Multi-task Adversarial Attacks against Black-box Model with Few-shot Queries10 Aug 2025
- 2025Stop Walking in Circles! Bailing Out Early in Projected Gradient Descent25 Mar 2025
- 2024Probing Human Visual Robustness with Neurally-Guided Deep Neural Networks4 May 2024
- 2023SoK: Pitfalls in Evaluating Black-Box Attacks26 Oct 2023
- 2023You Don't Need Robust Machine Learning to Manage Adversarial Attack Risks16 Jun 2023
- 2022DISCO: Adversarial Defense with Local Implicit Functions11 Dec 2022