mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FUTURE-AI: Guiding Principles and Consensus Recommendations for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging

arXiv 2109.09658 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2021cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) combined with the extensive amount of data generated by today's clinical systems, has led to the development of imaging AI solutions across the whole value chain of medical imaging, including image reconstruction, medical image segmentation, image-based diagnosis and treatment planning. Notwithstanding the successes and future potential of AI in medical imaging, many stakeholders are concerned of the potential risks and ethical implications of imaging AI solutions, which are perceived as complex, opaque, and difficult to comprehend, utilise, and trust in critical clinical applications. Addressing these concerns and risks, the FUTURE-AI framework has been proposed, which, sourced from a global multi-domain expert consensus, comprises guiding principles for increased trust, safety, and adoption for AI in healthcare. In this paper, we transform the general FUTURE-AI healthcare principles to a concise and specific AI implementation guide tailored to the needs of the medical imaging community. To this end, we carefully assess each building block of the FUTURE-AI framework consisting of (i) Fairness, (ii) Universality, (iii) Traceability, (iv) Usability, (v) Robustness and (vi) Explainability, and respectively define concrete best practices based on accumulated AI implementation experiences from five large European projects on AI in Health Imaging. We accompany our concrete step-by-step medical imaging development guide with a practical AI solution maturity checklist, thus enabling AI development teams to design, evaluate, maintain, and deploy technically, clinically and ethically trustworthy imaging AI solutions into clinical practice.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 218 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2021.

Builds on

47 of 218 references.

References · 47

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  6. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,410
  7. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  8. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  9. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  10. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  11. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
  12. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
35 more
  1. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
  2. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  3. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
  4. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  5. 2019Embracing Imperfect Datasets: A Review of Deep Learning Solutions for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 258
  6. 2019Deep Learning for Segmentation using an Open Large-Scale Dataset in 2D Echocardiographycited by 243
  7. 2017A Deep Cascade of Convolutional Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstructioncited by 231
  8. 2020Deep Structural Causal Models for Tractable Counterfactual Inferencecited by 210
  9. 2018To Trust Or Not To Trust A Classifiercited by 205
  10. 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
  11. 2019Causality matters in medical imagingcited by 193
  12. 2020CheXclusion: Fairness gaps in deep chest X-ray classifierscited by 153
  13. 2020Test-Time Adaptable Neural Networks for Robust Medical Image Segmentationcited by 102
  14. 2021Unbox the Black-box for the Medical Explainable AI via Multi-modal and Multi-centre Data Fusion: A Mini-Review, Two Showcases and Beyondcited by 75
  15. 2021This Looks Like That... Does it? Shortcomings of Latent Space Prototype Interpretability in Deep Networkscited by 65
  16. 2019Measuring the Quality of Explanations: The System Causability Scale (SCS). Comparing Human and Machine Explanationscited by 63
  17. 2016Image biomarker standardisation initiativecited by 61
  18. 2021Fairness in Cardiac MR Image Analysis: An Investigation of Bias Due to Data Imbalance in Deep Learning Based Segmentationcited by 57
  19. 2020Interpretability and Explainability: A Machine Learning Zoo Mini-tourcited by 55
  20. 2017Phase recovery and holographic image reconstruction using deep learning in neural networkscited by 54
  21. 2018On the Effect of Inter-observer Variability for a Reliable Estimation of Uncertainty of Medical Image Segmentationcited by 46
  22. 2021Concept drift detection and adaptation for federated and continual learningcited by 32
  23. 2019Regression Concept Vectors for Bidirectional Explanations in Histopathologycited by 31
  24. 2020Transparency, Auditability and eXplainability of Machine Learning Models in Credit Scoringcited by 26
  25. 2021Estimating and Improving Fairness with Adversarial Learningcited by 26
  26. 2019Testing the robustness of attribution methods for convolutional neural networks in MRI-based Alzheimer's disease classificationcited by 25
  27. 2017The Doctor Just Won't Accept That!cited by 21
  28. 2019Deep neural network or dermatologist?cited by 20
  29. 2020Interpretable Deep Models for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Response Predictioncited by 17
  30. 2019Provenance Data in the Machine Learning Lifecycle in Computational Science and Engineeringcited by 12
  31. 2020MRQy: An Open-Source Tool for Quality Control of MR Imaging Datacited by 12
  32. 2020Integrating uncertainty in deep neural networks for MRI based stroke analysiscited by 12
  33. 2019QC-Automator: Deep Learning-based Automated Quality Control for Diffusion MR Imagescited by 8
  34. 2019Incorporating Task-Specific Structural Knowledge into CNNs for Brain Midline Shift Detectioncited by 7
  35. 2020Adversarial Robust Training of Deep Learning MRI Reconstruction Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: