mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Trustworthy and Responsible AI for Human-Centric Autonomous Decision-Making Systems

arXiv 2408.15550 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2024cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has paved the way for revolutionary decision-making processes, which if harnessed appropriately, can contribute to advancements in various sectors, from healthcare to economics. However, its black box nature presents significant ethical challenges related to bias and transparency. AI applications are hugely impacted by biases, presenting inconsistent and unreliable findings, leading to significant costs and consequences, highlighting and perpetuating inequalities and unequal access to resources. Hence, developing safe, reliable, ethical, and Trustworthy AI systems is essential. Our team of researchers working with Trustworthy and Responsible AI, part of the Transdisciplinary Scholarship Initiative within the University of Calgary, conducts research on Trustworthy and Responsible AI, including fairness, bias mitigation, reproducibility, generalization, interpretability, and authenticity. In this paper, we review and discuss the intricacies of AI biases, definitions, methods of detection and mitigation, and metrics for evaluating bias. We also discuss open challenges with regard to the trustworthiness and widespread application of AI across diverse domains of human-centric decision making, as well as guidelines to foster Responsible and Trustworthy AI models.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 158 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2024.

Builds on

55 of 158 references.

References · 55

  1. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  4. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  5. 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
  6. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  7. 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,052
  8. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  9. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  10. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  11. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
  12. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
38 more
  1. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  2. 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 397
  3. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
  4. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  5. 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
  6. 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 206
  7. 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
  8. 2018Explaining Explanations in AIcited by 136
  9. 2021Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemscited by 124
  10. 2019The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goalscited by 100
  11. 2023Art and the science of generative AI: A deeper divecited by 93
  12. 2023Fairlearn: Assessing and Improving Fairness of AI Systemscited by 74
  13. 2018The Price of Fair PCA: One Extra Dimensioncited by 67
  14. 2021Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners' Processes, Challenges, and Needs for Supportcited by 61
  15. 2023Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulationcited by 60
  16. 2021Socially Responsible AI Algorithms: Issues, Purposes, and Challengescited by 56
  17. 2019FlipTest: Fairness Testing via Optimal Transportcited by 51
  18. 2020AI Lifecycle Models Need To Be Revised. An Exploratory Study in Fintechcited by 33
  19. 2022Addressing Fairness Issues in Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Reviewcited by 27
  20. 2023Disentangling Perceptions of Offensiveness: Cultural and Moral Correlatescited by 26
  21. 2019Stable and Fair Classificationcited by 25
  22. 2017Themis-ml: A Fairness-aware Machine Learning Interface for End-to-end Discrimination Discovery and Mitigationcited by 24
  23. 2019Autonomous Highway Driving using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
  24. 2018Automated Test Generation to Detect Individual Discrimination in AI Modelscited by 21
  25. 2022Potential sources of dataset bias complicate investigation of underdiagnosis by machine learning algorithmscited by 19
  26. 2023Towards Interpretable Sequence Continuation: Analyzing Shared Circuits in Large Language Modelscited by 14
  27. 2021FUTURE-AI: Guiding Principles and Consensus Recommendations for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imagingcited by 13
  28. 2023No Fair Lunch: A Causal Perspective on Dataset Bias in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 11
  29. 2021Statistical Perspectives on Reliability of Artificial Intelligence Systemscited by 10
  30. 2021Algorithmic Factors Influencing Bias in Machine Learningcited by 9
  31. 2019Algorithmic decision-making in AVs: Understanding ethical and technical concerns for smart citiescited by 8
  32. 2021On the Importance of Domain-specific Explanations in AI-based Cybersecurity Systems (Technical Report)cited by 7
  33. 2022Responsible Artificial Intelligence -- from Principles to Practicecited by 6
  34. 2022Unpacking the "Black Box" of AI in Educationcited by 5
  35. 2023Navigating Fairness Measures and Trade-Offscited by 5
  36. 2024Responsible Adoption of Generative AI in Higher Education: Developing a "Points to Consider" Approach Based on Faculty Perspectivescited by 5
  37. 2018Towards Composable Bias Rating of AI Servicescited by 4
  38. 2024Improving Explainable Object-induced Model through Uncertainty for Automated Vehiclescited by 4

50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.