Combining Rules and Embeddings via Neuro-Symbolic AI for Knowledge Base Completion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent interest in Knowledge Base Completion (KBC) has led to a plethora of approaches based on reinforcement learning, inductive logic programming and graph embeddings. In particular, rule-based KBC has led to interpretable rules while being comparable in performance with graph embeddings. Even within rule-based KBC, there exist different approaches that lead to rules of varying quality and previous work has not always been precise in highlighting these differences. Another issue that plagues most rule-based KBC is the non-uniformity of relation paths: some relation sequences occur in very few paths while others appear very frequently. In this paper, we show that not all rule-based KBC models are the same and propose two distinct approaches that learn in one case: 1) a mixture of relations and the other 2) a mixture of paths. When implemented on top of neuro-symbolic AI, which learns rules by extending Boolean logic to real-valued logic, the latter model leads to superior KBC accuracy outperforming state-of-the-art rule-based KBC by 2-10% in terms of mean reciprocal rank. Furthermore, to address the non-uniformity of relation paths, we combine rule-based KBC with graph embeddings thus improving our results even further and achieving the best of both worlds.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2021.
Builds on
15 of 26 references.
References · 15
- 2016Complex Embeddings for Simple Link Predictioncited by 897
- 2019RotatE: Knowledge Graph Embedding by Relational Rotation in Complex Spacecited by 893
- 2017Convolutional 2D Knowledge Graph Embeddingscited by 729
- 2019Quaternion Knowledge Graph Embeddingscited by 175
- 2019DRUM: End-To-End Differentiable Rule Mining On Knowledge Graphscited by 173
- 2017Go for a Walk and Arrive at the Answer: Reasoning Over Paths in Knowledge Bases using Reinforcement Learningcited by 161
- 2017End-to-End Differentiable Provingcited by 159
- 2018Canonical Tensor Decomposition for Knowledge Base Completioncited by 150
- 2019Neural Logic Machinescited by 144
- 2020Logical Neural Networkscited by 118
- 2020RNNLogic: Learning Logic Rules for Reasoning on Knowledge Graphscited by 117
- 2018Multi-Hop Knowledge Graph Reasoning with Reward Shapingcited by 102
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023Neurosymbolic AI for Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs: A Surveycited by 21
- 2025Large language models for artificial general intelligence (AGI): A survey of foundational principles and approachescited by 18
- 2024Neuro-Symbolic AI: Explainability, Challenges, and Future Trendscited by 10
- 2022R5: Rule Discovery with Reinforced and Recurrent Relational Reasoningcited by 7
- 2023Neurosymbolic AI for Reasoning on Biomedical Knowledge Graphscited by 4
- 2024MARS: A neurosymbolic approach for interpretable drug discoverycited by 2
- 2024Bridging the Gap: Representation Spaces in Neuro-Symbolic AIcited by 0
- 2025Large language models for artificial general intelligence (AGI): A survey of foundational principles and approaches6 Jan 2025
- 2024Bridging the Gap: Representation Spaces in Neuro-Symbolic AI7 Nov 2024
- 2024Neuro-Symbolic AI: Explainability, Challenges, and Future Trends7 Nov 2024
- 2024MARS: A neurosymbolic approach for interpretable drug discovery2 Oct 2024
- 2023Neurosymbolic AI for Reasoning on Biomedical Knowledge Graphs17 Jul 2023
- 2023Neurosymbolic AI for Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs: A Survey14 Feb 2023
- 2022R5: Rule Discovery with Reinforced and Recurrent Relational Reasoning13 May 2022