mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Quantile Regression for Uncertainty Estimation in Unsupervised and Supervised Lesion Detection

arXiv 2109.09374 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2021cs.LG cs.AI eess.IVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite impressive state-of-the-art performance on a wide variety of machine learning tasks, deep learning methods can produce over-confident predictions, particularly with limited training data. Therefore, quantifying uncertainty is particularly important in critical applications such as lesion detection and clinical diagnosis, where a realistic assessment of uncertainty is essential in determining surgical margins, disease status and appropriate treatment. In this work, we propose a novel approach that uses quantile regression for quantifying aleatoric uncertainty in both supervised and unsupervised lesion detection problems. The resulting confidence intervals can be used for lesion detection and segmentation. In the unsupervised setting, we combine quantile regression with the Variational AutoEncoder (VAE). Here we address the problem of quantifying uncertainty in the images that are reconstructed by the VAE as the basis for principled outlier or lesion detection. The VAE models the output as a conditionally independent Gaussian characterized by its mean and variance. Unfortunately, joint optimization of both mean and variance in the VAE leads to the well-known problem of shrinkage or underestimation of variance. Here we describe an alternative Quantile-Regression VAE (QR-VAE) that avoids this variance shrinkage problem by directly estimating conditional quantiles for the input image. Using the estimated quantiles, we compute the conditional mean and variance for the input image from which we then detect outliers by thresholding at a false-discovery-rate corrected p-value. In the supervised setting, we develop binary quantile regression (BQR) for the supervised lesion segmentation task. We show how BQR can be used to capture uncertainty in lesion boundaries in a manner that characterizes expert disagreement.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2021.

Builds on

24 of 50 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  3. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  4. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  5. 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 620
  6. 2015Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metriccited by 407
  7. 2018A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Imagescited by 281
  8. 2018Deep Autoencoding Models for Unsupervised Anomaly Segmentation in Brain MR Imagescited by 146
  9. 2020Stochastic Segmentation Networks: Modelling Spatially Correlated Aleatoric Uncertaintycited by 100
  10. 2018Unsupervised Detection of Lesions in Brain MRI using constrained adversarial auto-encoderscited by 83
  11. 2019A comparison of some conformal quantile regression methodscited by 76
  12. 2020Unsupervised Lesion Detection via Image Restoration with a Normative Priorcited by 65
12 more
  1. 2019Reliable training and estimation of variance networkscited by 63
  2. 2018Leveraging Uncertainty Estimates for Predicting Segmentation Qualitycited by 44
  3. 2019Supervised Uncertainty Quantification for Segmentation with Multiple Annotationscited by 42
  4. 2021Is segmentation uncertainty useful?cited by 37
  5. 2018Beyond expectation: Deep joint mean and quantile regression for spatio-temporal problemscited by 32
  6. 2013Automated Variational Inference in Probabilistic Programmingcited by 31
  7. 2021Spatially Varying Label Smoothing: Capturing Uncertainty from Expert Annotationscited by 31
  8. 2018Leveraging the Exact Likelihood of Deep Latent Variable Modelscited by 23
  9. 2020Modelling the Distribution of 3D Brain MRI using a 2D Slice VAEcited by 20
  10. 2019Robust Variational Autoencodercited by 6
  11. 2020Validating uncertainty in medical image translationcited by 6
  12. 2020Variational Variance: Simple, Reliable, Calibrated Heteroscedastic Noise Variance Parameterizationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.