Balanced Marginal and Joint Distributional Learning via Mixture Cramer-Wold Distance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the process of training a generative model, it becomes essential to measure the discrepancy between two high-dimensional probability distributions: the generative distribution and the ground-truth distribution of the observed dataset. Recently, there has been growing interest in an approach that involves slicing high-dimensional distributions, with the Cramer-Wold distance emerging as a promising method. However, we have identified that the Cramer-Wold distance primarily focuses on joint distributional learning, whereas understanding marginal distributional patterns is crucial for effective synthetic data generation. In this paper, we introduce a novel measure of dissimilarity, the mixture Cramer-Wold distance. This measure enables us to capture both marginal and joint distributional information simultaneously, as it incorporates a mixture measure with point masses on standard basis vectors. Building upon the mixture Cramer-Wold distance, we propose a new generative model called CWDAE (Cramer-Wold Distributional AutoEncoder), which shows remarkable performance in generating synthetic data when applied to real tabular datasets. Furthermore, our model offers the flexibility to adjust the level of data privacy with ease.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2023.
Builds on
25 of 43 references.
References · 25
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
- 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,031
- 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
- 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,135
- 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 695
- 2015Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metriccited by 407
- 2017Wasserstein Auto-Encoderscited by 371
- 2015Generative Moment Matching Networkscited by 252
- 2017VAE with a VampPriorcited by 247
- 2017A General and Adaptive Robust Loss Functioncited by 236
- 2020Focal Frequency Loss for Image Reconstruction and Synthesiscited by 204
- 2017Generating Multi-label Discrete Patient Records using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 197
13 more
- 2018Data Synthesis based on Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 184
- 2021CTAB-GAN: Effective Table Data Synthesizingcited by 156
- 2015Training generative neural networks via Maximum Mean Discrepancy optimizationcited by 149
- 2018Generative Modeling using the Sliced Wasserstein Distancecited by 108
- 2021Calibrated Multiple-Output Quantile Regression with Representation Learningcited by 49
- 2017From optimal transport to generative modeling: the VEGAN cookbookcited by 41
- 2020A Loss Function for Generative Neural Networks Based on Watson's Perceptual Modelcited by 39
- 2022The Health Gym: Synthetic Health-Related Datasets for the Development of Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 19
- 2018Cramer-Wold AutoEncodercited by 10
- 2023Distributional Learning of Variational AutoEncoder: Application to Synthetic Data Generationcited by 9
- 2019Implicit Discriminator in Variational Autoencodercited by 5
- 2020Generative models with kernel distance in data spacecited by 5
- 2021Deep Quantile Regression for Uncertainty Estimation in Unsupervised and Supervised Lesion Detectioncited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.