Read, Look or Listen? What's Needed for Solving a Multimodal Dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The prevalence of large-scale multimodal datasets presents unique challenges in assessing dataset quality. We propose a two-step method to analyze multimodal datasets, which leverages a small seed of human annotation to map each multimodal instance to the modalities required to process it. Our method sheds light on the importance of different modalities in datasets, as well as the relationship between them. We apply our approach to TVQA, a video question-answering dataset, and discover that most questions can be answered using a single modality, without a substantial bias towards any specific modality. Moreover, we find that more than 70% of the questions are solvable using several different single-modality strategies, e.g., by either looking at the video or listening to the audio, highlighting the limited integration of multiple modalities in TVQA. We leverage our annotation and analyze the MERLOT Reserve, finding that it struggles with image-based questions compared to text and audio, but also with auditory speaker identification. Based on our observations, we introduce a new test set that necessitates multiple modalities, observing a dramatic drop in model performance. Our methodology provides valuable insights into multimodal datasets and highlights the need for the development of more robust models.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2023.
Builds on
25 of 28 references.
References · 25
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
- 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 481
- 2018TVQA: Localized, Compositional Video Question Answeringcited by 463
- 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
- 2015MovieQA: Understanding Stories in Movies through Question-Answeringcited by 304
- 2020HybridQA: A Dataset of Multi-Hop Question Answering over Tabular and Textual Datacited by 263
- 2023Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Modelscited by 225
- 2022MERLOT Reserve: Neural Script Knowledge through Vision and Language and Soundcited by 184
- 2021MultiModalQA: Complex Question Answering over Text, Tables and Imagescited by 177
- 2019Audio-Visual Scene-Aware Dialogcited by 122
- 2015Yin and Yang: Balancing and Answering Binary Visual Questionscited by 109
13 more
- 2022Spread Spurious Attribute: Improving Worst-group Accuracy with Spurious Attribute Estimationcited by 88
- 2021Beyond Question-Based Biases: Assessing Multimodal Shortcut Learning in Visual Question Answeringcited by 71
- 2021Decoupling the Role of Data, Attention, and Losses in Multimodal Transformerscited by 63
- 2019Distribution Density, Tails, and Outliers in Machine Learning: Metrics and Applicationscited by 43
- 2017Video Question Answering via Attribute-Augmented Attention Network Learningcited by 39
- 2022Metadata Archaeology: Unearthing Data Subsets by Leveraging Training Dynamicscited by 26
- 2020On Modality Bias in the TVQA Datasetcited by 24
- 2021Data Efficient Masked Language Modeling for Vision and Languagecited by 18
- 2022The Value of Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 12
- 2017Being Negative but Constructively: Lessons Learnt from Creating Better Visual Question Answering Datasetscited by 11
- 2021MultiSubs: A Large-scale Multimodal and Multilingual Datasetcited by 10
- 2021Training Dynamic based data filtering may not work for NLP datasetscited by 3
- 2023Spacerini: Plug-and-play Search Engines with Pyserini and Hugging Facecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.