mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards High-Quality Temporal Action Detection with Sparse Proposals

arXiv 2109.08847 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2021cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Temporal Action Detection (TAD) is an essential and challenging topic in video understanding, aiming to localize the temporal segments containing human action instances and predict the action categories. The previous works greatly rely upon dense candidates either by designing varying anchors or enumerating all the combinations of boundaries on video sequences; therefore, they are related to complicated pipelines and sensitive hand-crafted designs. Recently, with the resurgence of Transformer, query-based methods have tended to become the rising solutions for their simplicity and flexibility. However, there still exists a performance gap between query-based methods and well-established methods. In this paper, we identify the main challenge lies in the large variants of action duration and the ambiguous boundaries for short action instances; nevertheless, quadratic-computational global attention prevents query-based methods to build multi-scale feature maps. Towards high-quality temporal action detection, we introduce Sparse Proposals to interact with the hierarchical features. In our method, named SP-TAD, each proposal attends to a local segment feature in the temporal feature pyramid. The local interaction enables utilization of high-resolution features to preserve action instances details. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, especially under high tIoU thresholds. E.g., we achieve the state-of-the-art performance on THUMOS14 (45.7% on [email protected], 33.4% on [email protected] and 53.5% on mAP@Avg) and competitive results on ActivityNet-1.3 (32.99% on mAP@Avg). Code will be made available at https://github.com/wjn922/SP-TAD.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2021.

Builds on

41 of 48 references.

References · 41

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  3. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  4. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  5. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
  6. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
  7. 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,960
  8. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
  9. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,862
  10. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,722
  11. 2019Generalized Intersection over Union: A Metric and A Loss for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 1,361
  12. 2017Cascade R-CNN: Delving into High Quality Object Detectioncited by 1,275
29 more
  1. 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,139
  2. 2014Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Action Recognition in Videoscited by 1,067
  3. 2016Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognitioncited by 899
  4. 2017Focal Loss for Dense Object Detectioncited by 749
  5. 2017Rethinking Spatiotemporal Feature Learning: Speed-Accuracy Trade-offs in Video Classificationcited by 521
  6. 2020Sparse R-CNN: End-to-End Object Detection with Learnable Proposalscited by 494
  7. 2014Long-term Recurrent Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition and Descriptioncited by 483
  8. 2017Soft-NMS -- Improving Object Detection With One Line of Codecited by 380
  9. 2019BMN: Boundary-Matching Network for Temporal Action Proposal Generationcited by 327
  10. 2018BSN: Boundary Sensitive Network for Temporal Action Proposal Generationcited by 271
  11. 2017Temporal Action Detection with Structured Segment Networkscited by 265
  12. 2019G-TAD: Sub-Graph Localization for Temporal Action Detectioncited by 248
  13. 2019Graph Convolutional Networks for Temporal Action Localizationcited by 208
  14. 2018Rethinking the Faster R-CNN Architecture for Temporal Action Localizationcited by 194
  15. 2017R-C3D: Region Convolutional 3D Network for Temporal Activity Detectioncited by 161
  16. 2021Learning Salient Boundary Feature for Anchor-free Temporal Action Localizationcited by 156
  17. 2021End-to-end Temporal Action Detection with Transformercited by 150
  18. 2019Gaussian Temporal Awareness Networks for Action Localizationcited by 135
  19. 2017Single Shot Temporal Action Detectioncited by 123
  20. 2021Relaxed Transformer Decoders for Direct Action Proposal Generationcited by 116
  21. 2017TURN TAP: Temporal Unit Regression Network for Temporal Action Proposalscited by 113
  22. 2021Temporal Context Aggregation Network for Temporal Action Proposal Refinementcited by 111
  23. 2019Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary Generatorcited by 89
  24. 2020Revisiting Anchor Mechanisms for Temporal Action Localizationcited by 75
  25. 2017Cascaded Boundary Regression for Temporal Action Detectioncited by 35
  26. 2020Accurate Temporal Action Proposal Generation with Relation-Aware Pyramid Networkcited by 28
  27. 2021Augmented Transformer with Adaptive Graph for Temporal Action Proposal Generationcited by 25
  28. 2021Temporal Action Proposal Generation with Transformerscited by 17
  29. 2021RGB Stream Is Enough for Temporal Action Detectioncited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3.

4 papers.