mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RGB Stream Is Enough for Temporal Action Detection

arXiv 2107.04362 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2021cs.CV cs.AIcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

State-of-the-art temporal action detectors to date are based on two-stream input including RGB frames and optical flow. Although combining RGB frames and optical flow boosts performance significantly, optical flow is a hand-designed representation which not only requires heavy computation, but also makes it methodologically unsatisfactory that two-stream methods are often not learned end-to-end jointly with the flow. In this paper, we argue that optical flow is dispensable in high-accuracy temporal action detection and image level data augmentation (ILDA) is the key solution to avoid performance degradation when optical flow is removed. To evaluate the effectiveness of ILDA, we design a simple yet efficient one-stage temporal action detector based on single RGB stream named DaoTAD. Our results show that when trained with ILDA, DaoTAD has comparable accuracy with all existing state-of-the-art two-stream detectors while surpassing the inference speed of previous methods by a large margin and the inference speed is astounding 6668 fps on GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. Code is available at urlhttps://github.com/Media-Smart/vedatad.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2021.

Builds on

48 of 61 references.

References · 48

  1. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  2. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  3. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  4. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  5. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
  6. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  7. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
  8. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  9. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,290
  10. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,160
  11. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
  12. 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,573
36 more
  1. 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
  2. 2017Cascade R-CNN: Delving into High Quality Object Detectioncited by 1,275
  3. 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,139
  4. 2016Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognitioncited by 899
  5. 2018TSM: Temporal Shift Module for Efficient Video Understandingcited by 852
  6. 2019Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 454
  7. 2020Generalized Focal Loss: Learning Qualified and Distributed Bounding Boxes for Dense Object Detectioncited by 408
  8. 2019BMN: Boundary-Matching Network for Temporal Action Proposal Generationcited by 327
  9. 2018BSN: Boundary Sensitive Network for Temporal Action Proposal Generationcited by 271
  10. 2017Temporal Action Detection with Structured Segment Networkscited by 265
  11. 2019G-TAD: Sub-Graph Localization for Temporal Action Detectioncited by 248
  12. 2019Graph Convolutional Networks for Temporal Action Localizationcited by 208
  13. 2018Rethinking the Faster R-CNN Architecture for Temporal Action Localizationcited by 194
  14. 2018Acquisition of Localization Confidence for Accurate Object Detectioncited by 174
  15. 2017R-C3D: Region Convolutional 3D Network for Temporal Activity Detectioncited by 161
  16. 2021Learning Salient Boundary Feature for Anchor-free Temporal Action Localizationcited by 156
  17. 2019STM: SpatioTemporal and Motion Encoding for Action Recognitioncited by 142
  18. 2019Gaussian Temporal Awareness Networks for Action Localizationcited by 135
  19. 2017Single Shot Temporal Action Detectioncited by 123
  20. 2017CDC: Convolutional-De-Convolutional Networks for Precise Temporal Action Localization in Untrimmed Videoscited by 112
  21. 2021Temporal Context Aggregation Network for Temporal Action Proposal Refinementcited by 111
  22. 2019Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary Generatorcited by 89
  23. 2020Boundary Content Graph Neural Network for Temporal Action Proposal Generationcited by 88
  24. 2017Optical Flow Guided Feature: A Fast and Robust Motion Representation for Video Action Recognitioncited by 82
  25. 2018Multi-granularity Generator for Temporal Action Proposalcited by 77
  26. 2020Revisiting Anchor Mechanisms for Temporal Action Localizationcited by 75
  27. 2020MotionSqueeze: Neural Motion Feature Learning for Video Understandingcited by 72
  28. 2020BSN++: Complementary Boundary Regressor with Scale-Balanced Relation Modeling for Temporal Action Proposal Generationcited by 65
  29. 2017Appearance-and-Relation Networks for Video Classificationcited by 61
  30. 2018CTAP: Complementary Temporal Action Proposal Generationcited by 46
  31. 2019IoU-aware Single-stage Object Detector for Accurate Localizationcited by 36
  32. 2020Accurate Temporal Action Proposal Generation with Relation-Aware Pyramid Networkcited by 28
  33. 2019IoU-balanced Loss Functions for Single-stage Object Detectioncited by 22
  34. 2018S3D: Single Shot multi-Span Detector via Fully 3D Convolutional Networkscited by 16
  35. 2019Deep Concept-wise Temporal Convolutional Networks for Action Localizationcited by 10
  36. 2020Multi-Level Temporal Pyramid Network for Action Detectioncited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 8; 2023: 4; 2024: 2.

16 papers.

Sort: