mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Self-training with Few-shot Rationalization: Teacher Explanations Aid Student in Few-shot NLU

arXiv 2109.08259 ↗First posted 17 Sep 2021cs.CLcited by 13

On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → Self-training for few-shot NLP

Abstract (arXiv)

While pre-trained language models have obtained state-of-the-art performance for several natural language understanding tasks, they are quite opaque in terms of their decision-making process. While some recent works focus on rationalizing neural predictions by highlighting salient concepts in the text as justifications or rationales, they rely on thousands of labeled training examples for both task labels as well as an-notated rationales for every instance. Such extensive large-scale annotations are infeasible to obtain for many tasks. To this end, we develop a multi-task teacher-student framework based on self-training language models with limited task-specific labels and rationales, and judicious sample selection to learn from informative pseudo-labeled examples1. We study several characteristics of what constitutes a good rationale and demonstrate that the neural model performance can be significantly improved by making it aware of its rationalized predictions, particularly in low-resource settings. Extensive experiments in several bench-mark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Self-training for few-shot NLP, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2021.

Builds on

18 of 24 references.

References · 18

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  4. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  5. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
  6. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
  7. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  8. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
  9. 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
  10. 2020Rethinking Pre-training and Self-trainingcited by 352
  11. 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
  12. 2020Learning to Faithfully Rationalize by Constructioncited by 113
6 more
  1. 2019Rethinking Cooperative Rationalization: Introspective Extraction and Complement Controlcited by 96
  2. 2020Evaluating Explanations: How much do explanations from the teacher aid students?cited by 94
  3. 2020An Information Bottleneck Approach for Controlling Conciseness in Rationale Extractioncited by 69
  4. 2019Inferring Which Medical Treatments Work from Reports of Clinical Trialscited by 63
  5. 2020Adaptive Self-training for Few-shot Neural Sequence Labelingcited by 18
  6. 2020Weakly- and Semi-supervised Evidence Extractioncited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 7; 2024: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Can In-context Learners Learn a Reasoning Concept from Demonstrations?
  2. 2025Investigating the Impact of Rationales for LLMs on Natural Language Understanding
  3. 2024The Surprising Effectiveness of Test-Time Training for Few-Shot Learning
  4. 2024Quiet-STaR: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Think Before Speaking
  5. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
  6. 2024Leveraging Zero-Shot Prompting for Efficient Language Model Distillation
  7. 2024Many-Shot In-Context Learning
  8. 2021STraTA: Self-Training with Task Augmentation for Better Few-shot Learning