mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Few Shot Rationale Generation using Self-Training with Dual Teachers

arXiv 2306.03315 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → Self-training for few-shot NLP

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-rationalizing models that also generate a free-text explanation for their predicted labels are an important tool to build trustworthy AI applications. Since generating explanations for annotated labels is a laborious and costly pro cess, recent models rely on large pretrained language models (PLMs) as their backbone and few-shot learning. In this work we explore a self-training approach leveraging both labeled and unlabeled data to further improve few-shot models, under the assumption that neither human written rationales nor annotated task labels are available at scale. We introduce a novel dual-teacher learning framework, which learns two specialized teacher models for task prediction and rationalization using self-training and distills their knowledge into a multi-tasking student model that can jointly generate the task label and rationale. Furthermore, we formulate a new loss function, Masked Label Regularization (MLR) which promotes explanations to be strongly conditioned on predicted labels. Evaluation on three public datasets demonstrate that the proposed methods are effective in modeling task labels and generating faithful rationales.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Self-training for few-shot NLP, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. Builds on 28 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2023.

Builds on

28 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021Self-training with Few-shot Rationalization: Teacher Explanations Aid Student in Few-shot NLU17 Sep

Other references · 27

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  4. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  5. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  6. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  7. 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoningcited by 895
  8. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
  9. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  10. 2018Born Again Neural Networkscited by 539
  11. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
  12. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
15 more
  1. 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
  2. 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 189
  3. 2020Measuring Association Between Labels and Free-Text Rationalescited by 159
  4. 2019Revisiting Self-Training for Neural Sequence Generationcited by 154
  5. 2020WT5?! Training Text-to-Text Models to Explain their Predictionscited by 148
  6. 2020Leakage-Adjusted Simulatability: Can Models Generate Non-Trivial Explanations of Their Behavior in Natural Language?cited by 95
  7. 2021Multi-Task Self-Training for Learning General Representationscited by 85
  8. 2021Few-Shot Self-Rationalization with Natural Language Promptscited by 83
  9. 2021Adaptive Multi-Teacher Multi-level Knowledge Distillationcited by 69
  10. 2020Reinforced Multi-Teacher Selection for Knowledge Distillationcited by 62
  11. 2022PINTO: Faithful Language Reasoning Using Prompt-Generated Rationalescited by 56
  12. 2020SemEval-2020 Task 4: Commonsense Validation and Explanationcited by 42
  13. 2021Improving Compositional Generalization with Self-Training for Data-to-Text Generationcited by 19
  14. 2022FRAME: Evaluating Rationale-Label Consistency Metrics for Free-Text Rationalescited by 10
  15. 2021Are Training Resources Insufficient? Predict First Then Explain!cited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Leveraging Zero-Shot Prompting for Efficient Language Model Distillation
  2. 2022Can In-context Learners Learn a Reasoning Concept from Demonstrations?
  3. 2021STraTA: Self-Training with Task Augmentation for Better Few-shot Learning
  4. 2024Many-Shot In-Context Learning
  5. 2024Quiet-STaR: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Think Before Speaking
  6. 2021Revisiting Self-Training for Few-Shot Learning of Language Model
  7. 2025Self-Enhanced Reasoning Training: Activating Latent Reasoning in Small Models for Enhanced Reasoning Distillation
  8. 2024The Surprising Effectiveness of Test-Time Training for Few-Shot Learning