mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Divide-and-Merge Point Cloud Clustering Algorithm for LiDAR Panoptic Segmentation

arXiv 2109.08224 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2021cs.CV cs.ROcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Clustering objects from the LiDAR point cloud is an important research problem with many applications such as autonomous driving. To meet the real-time requirement, existing research proposed to apply the connected-component-labeling (CCL) technique on LiDAR spherical range image with a heuristic condition to check if two neighbor points are connected. However, LiDAR range image is different from a binary image which has a deterministic condition to tell if two pixels belong to the same component. The heuristic condition used on the LiDAR range image only works empirically, which suggests the LiDAR clustering algorithm should be robust to potential failures of the empirical heuristic condition. To overcome this challenge, this paper proposes a divide-and-merge LiDAR clustering algorithm. This algorithm firstly conducts clustering in each evenly divided local region, then merges the local clustered small components by voting on edge point pairs. Assuming there are N LiDAR points of objects in total with m divided local regions, the time complexity of the proposed algorithm is O(N)+O(m2). A smaller m means the voting will involve more neighbor points, but the time complexity will become larger. So the m controls the trade-off between the time complexity and the clustering accuracy. A proper m helps the proposed algorithm work in real-time as well as maintain good performance. We evaluate the divide-and-merge clustering algorithm on the SemanticKITTI panoptic segmentation benchmark by cascading it with a state-of-the-art semantic segmentation model. The final performance evaluated through the leaderboard achieves the best among all published methods. The proposed algorithm is implemented with C++ and wrapped as a python function. It can be easily used with the modern deep learning framework in python.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2021.

Builds on

15 of 33 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,715
  2. 2019KPConv: Flexible and Deformable Convolution for Point Cloudscited by 1,205
  3. 2019PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detectioncited by 891
  4. 2018Panoptic Segmentationcited by 802
  5. 2020Cylindrical and Asymmetrical 3D Convolution Networks for LiDAR Segmentationcited by 389
  6. 2019Seamless Scene Segmentationcited by 112
  7. 2021Panoptic-PolarNet: Proposal-free LiDAR Point Cloud Panoptic Segmentationcited by 107
  8. 2020LiDAR-based Panoptic Segmentation via Dynamic Shifting Networkcited by 84
  9. 2021EfficientLPS: Efficient LiDAR Panoptic Segmentationcited by 76
  10. 2020Panoster: End-to-end Panoptic Segmentation of LiDAR Point Cloudscited by 46
  11. 2019Point Cloud Oversegmentation with Graph-Structured Deep Metric Learningcited by 42
  12. 2020A Benchmark for LiDAR-based Panoptic Segmentation based on KITTIcited by 40
3 more
  1. 2021A Surface Geometry Model for LiDAR Depth Completioncited by 18
  2. 2021A Technical Survey and Evaluation of Traditional Point Cloud Clustering Methods for LiDAR Panoptic Segmentationcited by 10
  3. 2017Graph Based Over-Segmentation Methods for 3D Point Cloudscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.

9 papers.