A Divide-and-Merge Point Cloud Clustering Algorithm for LiDAR Panoptic Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Clustering objects from the LiDAR point cloud is an important research problem with many applications such as autonomous driving. To meet the real-time requirement, existing research proposed to apply the connected-component-labeling (CCL) technique on LiDAR spherical range image with a heuristic condition to check if two neighbor points are connected. However, LiDAR range image is different from a binary image which has a deterministic condition to tell if two pixels belong to the same component. The heuristic condition used on the LiDAR range image only works empirically, which suggests the LiDAR clustering algorithm should be robust to potential failures of the empirical heuristic condition. To overcome this challenge, this paper proposes a divide-and-merge LiDAR clustering algorithm. This algorithm firstly conducts clustering in each evenly divided local region, then merges the local clustered small components by voting on edge point pairs. Assuming there are N LiDAR points of objects in total with m divided local regions, the time complexity of the proposed algorithm is O(N)+O(m2). A smaller m means the voting will involve more neighbor points, but the time complexity will become larger. So the m controls the trade-off between the time complexity and the clustering accuracy. A proper m helps the proposed algorithm work in real-time as well as maintain good performance. We evaluate the divide-and-merge clustering algorithm on the SemanticKITTI panoptic segmentation benchmark by cascading it with a state-of-the-art semantic segmentation model. The final performance evaluated through the leaderboard achieves the best among all published methods. The proposed algorithm is implemented with C++ and wrapped as a python function. It can be easily used with the modern deep learning framework in python.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2021.
Builds on
15 of 33 references.
References · 15
- 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,715
- 2019KPConv: Flexible and Deformable Convolution for Point Cloudscited by 1,205
- 2019PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detectioncited by 891
- 2018Panoptic Segmentationcited by 802
- 2020Cylindrical and Asymmetrical 3D Convolution Networks for LiDAR Segmentationcited by 389
- 2019Seamless Scene Segmentationcited by 112
- 2021Panoptic-PolarNet: Proposal-free LiDAR Point Cloud Panoptic Segmentationcited by 107
- 2020LiDAR-based Panoptic Segmentation via Dynamic Shifting Networkcited by 84
- 2021EfficientLPS: Efficient LiDAR Panoptic Segmentationcited by 76
- 2020Panoster: End-to-end Panoptic Segmentation of LiDAR Point Cloudscited by 46
- 2019Point Cloud Oversegmentation with Graph-Structured Deep Metric Learningcited by 42
- 2020A Benchmark for LiDAR-based Panoptic Segmentation based on KITTIcited by 40
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
9 papers.
- 2022Uncertainty-aware Panoptic Segmentationcited by 17
- 20234D-Former: Multimodal 4D Panoptic Segmentationcited by 12
- 2024Lidar Panoptic Segmentation in an Open Worldcited by 8
- 2022Uncertainty-aware LiDAR Panoptic Segmentationcited by 6
- 2024PointGL: A Simple Global-Local Framework for Efficient Point Cloud Analysiscited by 5
- 2024AutoInst: Automatic Instance-Based Segmentation of LiDAR 3D Scanscited by 3
- 2025Is clustering enough for LiDAR instance segmentation? A state-of-the-art training-free baselinecited by 1
- 2023Active Velocity Estimation using Light Curtains via Self-Supervised Multi-Armed Banditscited by 0
- 2024DQFormer: Towards Unified LiDAR Panoptic Segmentation with Decoupled Queriescited by 0
- 2025Is clustering enough for LiDAR instance segmentation? A state-of-the-art training-free baseline17 Mar 2025
- 2024Lidar Panoptic Segmentation in an Open World22 Sep 2024
- 2024DQFormer: Towards Unified LiDAR Panoptic Segmentation with Decoupled Queries28 Aug 2024
- 2024AutoInst: Automatic Instance-Based Segmentation of LiDAR 3D Scans24 Mar 2024
- 2024PointGL: A Simple Global-Local Framework for Efficient Point Cloud Analysis22 Jan 2024
- 20234D-Former: Multimodal 4D Panoptic Segmentation2 Nov 2023
- 2023Active Velocity Estimation using Light Curtains via Self-Supervised Multi-Armed Bandits24 Feb 2023
- 2022Uncertainty-aware LiDAR Panoptic Segmentation10 Oct 2022
- 2022Uncertainty-aware Panoptic Segmentation29 Jun 2022