mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

YES SIR!Optimizing Semantic Space of Negatives with Self-Involvement Ranker

arXiv 2109.06436 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2021cs.IR cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pre-trained model such as BERT has been proved to be an effective tool for dealing with Information Retrieval (IR) problems. Due to its inspiring performance, it has been widely used to tackle with real-world IR problems such as document ranking. Recently, researchers have found that selecting "hard" rather than "random" negative samples would be beneficial for fine-tuning pre-trained models on ranking tasks. However, it remains elusive how to leverage hard negative samples in a principled way. To address the aforementioned issues, we propose a fine-tuning strategy for document ranking, namely Self-Involvement Ranker (SIR), to dynamically select hard negative samples to construct high-quality semantic space for training a high-quality ranking model. Specifically, SIR consists of sequential compressors implemented with pre-trained models. Front compressor selects hard negative samples for rear compressor. Moreover, SIR leverages supervisory signal to adaptively adjust semantic space of negative samples. Finally, supervisory signal in rear compressor is computed based on condition probability and thus can control sample dynamic and further enhance the model performance. SIR is a lightweight and general framework for pre-trained models, which simplifies the ranking process in industry practice. We test our proposed solution on MS MARCO with document ranking setting, and the results show that SIR can significantly improve the ranking performance of various pre-trained models. Moreover, our method became the new SOTA model anonymously on MS MARCO Document ranking leaderboard in May 2021.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2021.

Builds on

25 of 35 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
  4. 2019Cross-lingual Language Model Pretrainingcited by 1,088
  5. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
  6. 2017An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 791
  7. 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 691
  8. 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 619
  9. 2019Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Natural Language Understandingcited by 349
  10. 2018BabyAI: A Platform to Study the Sample Efficiency of Grounded Language Learningcited by 238
  11. 2020Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Searchcited by 155
  12. 2021Optimizing Dense Retrieval Model Training with Hard Negativescited by 154
13 more
  1. 2020Pre-training Tasks for Embedding-based Large-scale Retrievalcited by 153
  2. 2017A Deep Relevance Matching Model for Ad-hoc Retrievalcited by 126
  3. 2019Context-Aware Sentence/Passage Term Importance Estimation For First Stage Retrievalcited by 65
  4. 2021Rethink Training of BERT Rerankers in Multi-Stage Retrieval Pipelinecited by 65
  5. 2018Universal Language Model Fine-tuning for Text Classificationcited by 50
  6. 2020PROP: Pre-training with Representative Words Prediction for Ad-hoc Retrievalcited by 40
  7. 2015A Deep Architecture for Semantic Matching with Multiple Positional Sentence Representationscited by 32
  8. 2016Match-SRNN: Modeling the Recursive Matching Structure with Spatial RNNcited by 27
  9. 2021B-PROP: Bootstrapped Pre-training with Representative Words Prediction for Ad-hoc Retrievalcited by 25
  10. 2017PACRR: A Position-Aware Neural IR Model for Relevance Matchingcited by 22
  11. 2017DeepRank: A New Deep Architecture for Relevance Ranking in Information Retrievalcited by 21
  12. 2021Neural ranking models for document retrievalcited by 16
  13. 2021Revisit Recommender System in the Permutation Prospectivecited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.