mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Revisit Recommender System in the Permutation Prospective

arXiv 2102.12057 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2021cs.IRcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recommender systems (RS) work effective at alleviating information overload and matching user interests in various web-scale applications. Most RS retrieve the user's favorite candidates and then rank them by the rating scores in the greedy manner. In the permutation prospective, however, current RS come to reveal the following two limitations: 1) They neglect addressing the permutation-variant influence within the recommended results; 2) Permutation consideration extends the latent solution space exponentially, and current RS lack the ability to evaluate the permutations. Both drive RS away from the permutation-optimal recommended results and better user experience. To approximate the permutation-optimal recommended results effectively and efficiently, we propose a novel permutation-wise framework PRS in the re-ranking stage of RS, which consists of Permutation-Matching (PMatch) and Permutation-Ranking (PRank) stages successively. Specifically, the PMatch stage is designed to obtain the candidate list set, where we propose the FPSA algorithm to generate multiple candidate lists via the permutation-wise and goal-oriented beam search algorithm. Afterwards, for the candidate list set, the PRank stage provides a unified permutation-wise ranking criterion named LR metric, which is calculated by the rating scores of elaborately designed permutation-wise model DPWN. Finally, the list with the highest LR score is recommended to the user. Empirical results show that PRS consistently and significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, PRS has achieved a performance improvement of 11.0% on PV metric and 8.7% on IPV metric after the successful deployment in one popular recommendation scenario of Taobao application.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 5.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Discrete Conditional Diffusion for Reranking in Recommendationcited by 19
  2. 2021Cross DQN: Cross Deep Q Network for Ads Allocation in Feedcited by 18
  3. 2023PIER: Permutation-Level Interest-Based End-to-End Re-ranking Framework in E-commercecited by 8
  4. 2025NLGR: Utilizing Neighbor Lists for Generative Rerank in Personalized Recommendation Systemscited by 5
  5. 2025GReF: A Unified Generative Framework for Efficient Reranking via Ordered Multi-token Predictioncited by 4
  6. 2022Learning List-wise Representation in Reinforcement Learning for Ads Allocation with Multiple Auxiliary Taskscited by 3
  7. 2026Efficient Personalized Reranking with Semi-Autoregressive Generation and Online Knowledge Distillationcited by 3
  8. 2024Advancing Re-Ranking with Multimodal Fusion and Target-Oriented Auxiliary Tasks in E-Commerce Searchcited by 2
  9. 2021YES SIR!Optimizing Semantic Space of Negatives with Self-Involvement Rankercited by 1
  10. 2025Learning Distributions over Permutations and Rankings with Factorized Representationscited by 0
  11. 2025RewardRank: Optimizing True Learning-to-Rank Utilitycited by 0
  12. 2025RIA: A Ranking-Infused Approach for Optimized listwise CTR Predictioncited by 0
4 more
  1. 2026FlashEvaluator: Expanding Search Space with Parallel Sequence-Level Evaluationcited by 0
  2. 2026Learning Permutation Distributions via Reflected Diffusion on Rankscited by 0
  3. 2026Dual-Rerank: Fusing Causality and Utility for Industrial Generative Rerankingcited by 0
  4. 2026LIGE-GR: A Smooth Leap from Ranking to Generative Recommendation in the LLM Eracited by 0