mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Joint Graph Learning and Matching for Semantic Feature Correspondence

arXiv 2109.00240 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2021cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, powered by the learned discriminative representation via graph neural network (GNN) models, deep graph matching methods have made great progresses in the task of matching semantic features. However, these methods usually rely on heuristically generated graph patterns, which may introduce unreliable relationships to hurt the matching performance. In this paper, we propose a joint graph learning and matching network, named GLAM, to explore reliable graph structures for boosting graph matching. GLAM adopts a pure attention-based framework for both graph learning and graph matching. Specifically, it employs two types of attention mechanisms, self-attention and cross-attention for the task. The self-attention discovers the relationships between features and to further update feature representations over the learnt structures; and the cross-attention computes cross-graph correlations between the two feature sets to be matched for feature reconstruction. Moreover, the final matching solution is directly derived from the output of the cross-attention layer, without employing a specific matching decision module. The proposed method is evaluated on three popular visual matching benchmarks (Pascal VOC, Willow Object and SPair-71k), and it outperforms previous state-of-the-art graph matching methods by significant margins on all benchmarks. Furthermore, the graph patterns learnt by our model are validated to be able to remarkably enhance previous deep graph matching methods by replacing their handcrafted graph structures with the learnt ones.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2021.

Builds on

22 of 68 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  5. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  6. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  7. 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,443
  8. 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,013
  9. 2018Dual Attention Network for Scene Segmentationcited by 1,003
  10. 2017AttnGAN: Fine-Grained Text to Image Generation with Attentional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 664
  11. 2019Cross-Modal Self-Attention Network for Referring Image Segmentationcited by 263
  12. 2021AutoFormer: Searching Transformers for Visual Recognitioncited by 188
10 more
  1. 2017SplineCNN: Fast Geometric Deep Learning with Continuous B-Spline Kernelscited by 161
  2. 2019SPair-71k: A Large-scale Benchmark for Semantic Correspondencecited by 146
  3. 2019Learning Combinatorial Embedding Networks for Deep Graph Matchingcited by 99
  4. 2020Deep Graph Matching Consensuscited by 85
  5. 2019Neural Graph Matching Network: Learning Lawler's Quadratic Assignment Problem with Extension to Hypergraph and Multiple-graph Matchingcited by 84
  6. 2020Deep Graph Matching via Blackbox Differentiation of Combinatorial Solverscited by 81
  7. 2019Universal Graph Transformer Self-Attention Networkscited by 41
  8. 2019NM-Net: Mining Reliable Neighbors for Robust Feature Correspondencescited by 29
  9. 2016A Study of Lagrangean Decompositions and Dual Ascent Solvers for Graph Matchingcited by 26
  10. 2021Deep Graph Matching under Quadratic Constraintcited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 5.

8 papers.