mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Human Sequential Decision-Making with Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2108.08454 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2021cs.LG cs.HCcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Workers spend a significant amount of time learning how to make good decisions. Evaluating the efficacy of a given decision, however, can be complicated -- e.g., decision outcomes are often long-term and relate to the original decision in complex ways. Surprisingly, even though learning good decision-making strategies is difficult, they can often be expressed in simple and concise forms. Focusing on sequential decision-making, we design a novel machine learning algorithm that is capable of extracting "best practices" from trace data and conveying its insights to humans in the form of interpretable "tips". Our algorithm selects the tip that best bridges the gap between the actions taken by human workers and those taken by the optimal policy in a way that accounts for which actions are consequential for achieving higher performance. We evaluate our approach through a series of randomized controlled experiments where participants manage a virtual kitchen. Our experiments show that the tips generated by our algorithm can significantly improve human performance relative to intuitive baselines. In addition, we discuss a number of empirical insights that can help inform the design of algorithms intended for human-AI interfaces. For instance, we find evidence that participants do not simply blindly follow our tips; instead, they combine them with their own experience to discover additional strategies for improving performance.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2021.

Builds on

14 of 76 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  4. 2018Programmatically Interpretable Reinforcement Learningcited by 192
  5. 2018Verifiable Reinforcement Learning via Policy Extractioncited by 176
  6. 2018On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detectioncited by 159
  7. 2015Interpretable classifiers using rules and Bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction modelcited by 140
  8. 2020Explainable Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 139
  9. 2020Aligning Superhuman AI with Human Behavior: Chess as a Model Systemcited by 78
  10. 2018Do Explanations make VQA Models more Predictable to a Human?cited by 51
  11. 2018Human-in-the-Loop Interpretability Priorcited by 35
  12. 2017It Takes Two to Tango: Towards Theory of AI's Mindcited by 11
2 more
  1. 2019Measuring the Completeness of Theoriescited by 6
  2. 2016Improving Human-Machine Cooperative Visual Search With Soft Highlightingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 6.

12 papers.